The worst Die Hard. It's a good action movie, but a bad day to Die Hard.

Terrible, a disgrace to the Die Hard name. I turned it off halfway through. Save yourself the time, skip this mess and watch the original Die Hard again, it's one of the best action movies ever made.

In the next instalment.... John Mcclanes dog joins the S.A.S

Awesome! The one word to describe the movie action packed the way I like it. But if you don't you won't like this violent movie .

Also known as..

Die Hard 5: The Movie That Hates and Destroys Vehicles

Seriously.. how many cars died in the making of this movie. There should be a stat for that.

Also, I very much enjoyed this movie. Good times all around. It was equal parts ridiculous and excitement. Just what I was expecting.

The ranking of Die Hards is now as follow: 1,3,5,4,2

I give 5 the upper hand on 4 because Justin Long got on my nerves in 4.

What a disgrace for the franchise. I'm socked!

A good day to have more story than brainless action. While Jack McClaine is just another ingrate who whines that John wasn't a good father. He saved his mom twice and all she does is bad mouth him and turn the kids against John.
But don't worry; the father and son duo can bond during many shoot-outs with the most forgettable villains of the franchise.

A lazy 5th film that make all the sequels look as good as the first movie. Instead of having an ingrate daughter who calls her dad John. You have the son Jack McClane (Jai Courtney) who also has daddy issues after his dad was a hero 4 times in the past.
They argue during shoot-outs while Jack also calls his dad by his first name. Will he learn to respect his dad like his sister did in the 4th film ? There's also pretty much all action and very little of a coherent story.

Over the top, unbelievable, unrealistic action movie with weak story line......and I like it. :-)

not worth it. it's a pity for the original trilogy this one here ever happened... just my 2 cents.

The only thing this movie has about Die Hard is the name and the "McClane". Die hard died ( in a good way ) inside a trilogy. The other 2 are just average/below average action movies that cached a ride on one of the best action movies better made ( US ) .

It would have been a good movie, if it hasn't anything to do with Die Hard.

Can't even see this movie as a Die Hard in anyway.

I believed it when I heard this was the worst of the (good) bunch, but I guess I just had to see for myself. It's pretty bad. The way it began felt off. They just dived right into crazy action scenes and then took far too long to tell the audience what the hell was going on. I'm not sure I was ever especially clear on what that was. It dragged, and I kept losing interest and having to try and refocus on what was happening. It had some chuckle worthy, fun dialogue here and there, but other than that; it sucked, _hard_.

Now, this was just bad. Was it really this bad the first time I saw it?!?

A Good Day to Die Hard is not worthy of the Die Hard name.

First of all...The story sucks!!! Severe pacing issues and does shit all to make you care for any of the characters. The bad guy is so much worse than any of the other movies...including the weak one in the fourth installment. It's just...bad.

Pair that up with little to no chemistry between the leads...or any of the other characters for that matter, and you get this mess of a movie.

I'll admit that some of the action is cool, but then again...it's doing what every other installment in this franchise has done. Trying to upstage its predecessors, and well...now it's getting borderline farcical.

Stay away from this shit, and just watch one of the first three again...maybe even the fourth if you are brave.