I didn't know enough about the case going in to notice how biased the documentary is while I was watching it. If it wasn't for the fact that I instinctively distrusted Amanda Knox from the get-go, I wouldn't know everything the producers left out. **Which is more than enough to inspire reasonable doubt on Amanda and Raffaele.**

The documentary is made in such a way that, even though they're trying to appear unbiased, all the information they've provided throughout leads to the conclusion that they're innocent. They left out everything else that could make you question that "fact", and they brush past many things that could be examined deeper. Why? Because these things would make Amanda and Raffaele suspicious in the mind of the viewer. But those things happened and we deserve to know them.

That, to me, is far from a biased documentary, which means it's not a good one. I don't appreciate it when documentary-makers try to influence me one way or another. When they disguise information or omit it, believing I won't notice or I won't care enough to look further. I especially don't like it when they try to come off as righteous or unbiased, when, in fact, they're not showing things as they are, but as they want them to be.