Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Reviews for: Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

SkinnyFilmBuff
4/10  one year ago
Am I becoming a harsher critic or are Marvel movies just getting worse? Probably a little bit of both, but this one certainly makes it feel like the latter. I've described much of the recent Marvel content as serviceable; that is to say, not good, but not bad either. I can't be so generous with this film. It was bad. The dialogue. The plot. The special effects. The dialogue. The humor. The setting. The dialogue. But really, the dialogue was bad. So full of clichés. Bland. Derivative. Forced.

Now, I prefer my reviews to have at least some specifics to hold myself accountable and make sure I'm not just throwing out substance-less word vomit, so here are a couple of problems that I still remember one week after watching this mess: (1) Janet keeping all this crap a secret; (2) Janet continuing to keep all this crap a secret when the crap is practically overflowing; (3) Janet making dumb excuses as to why she won't tell everyone about this secret crap. Okay, I'll throw in some non-Janet secret keeping related issues as well. (4) MODOK doesn't work in live action; (5) the quantum realm's rag-tag team of rebels is underdeveloped and I didn't care about them at all; (6) daughter hacking quantum realm AV system was an eye roll moment; and (7) Michael Douglas' final(?) line (something akin to "Sorry I'm late") was groan inducing.

It would be unfair to be so harsh and not also acknowledge the film's positives. It's a short list: (1) Jonathan Majors. He is the only one that sells his lines. Unfortunately he isn't enough to carry the movie.
Like  -  Dislike  -  70
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Jordyep
CONTAINS SPOILERS3/10  one year ago
If you’d ask me what the highlights of the previous 2 _Ant-Man_ movies are, I’d probably answer: I don’t remember much about them, but I liked those quirky scenes narrated by Michael Peña and the creative use of shrinking powers during the set pieces. For as forgettable as both movies are, at least I still remember the set piece with the train in the first movie, or the kitchen fight from the second movie. With this movie, I'm already having trouble remembering any specifics, because all of those typical Edgar Wright touches have been erased in favor of being a big CGI extravaganza. So, allow me to do a general breakdown of the three acts instead.

**1st act**: We get a set-up that's similar to _Spiderman: No Way Home_, which means it’s in a hurry to get to the main dish, making every main character look like an irresponsible dumbass in the process. Once we get to the quantum realm, we're met with a lot of cringe comedy. The design of the world is fine, it feels like a mashup of prequel era _Star Wars, Avatar, The Fifth Element_ and _Spy Kids_, not like an original creation. A stronger, visionary director probably would've made a big difference here, or at least one who knows how to use the volume stages, because that might’ve avoided the _Spy Kids_ comparisons.

**2nd act**: Jonathan Majors arrives to do some actual acting, and he somehow pulls it off despite the hammy, pseudo-intellectual lines given to him by the script. Michelle Pfeiffer also gets some time to shine, when she's on the screen with Majors it feels like the movie actually comes to life for a brief second. Still, the scenes with Kang feel tonally inconsistent with the rest of the movie, and I’m not sold on the idea of him being the Avengers level threat we’ve been waiting for. When it comes to the other actors, most of them are given nothing interesting to do, the supposed co-lead of this movie (according to the title) included. I don't like picking on younger actors, but it needs to be said that Emma Fuhrmann expressed more emotion during her 10 second appearance as Cassie Lang in _Avengers: Endgame_ than Kathryn Newton did here. In terms of story, this portion of the movie is all about set-up and clunky exposition as delivered through monologues. One of the characters even gets introduced with his own 'previously on _Ant-Man_' recap, which I find insulting and shows what little faith this studio has in its audience. Besides, it probably would’ve been better to cut this character, because his inclusion is easily one of Marvel's worst creative decisions (the design and visual effects are laughable). Generally I'd say this act is pretty boring, and occasionally embarrassing.

**3rd act**: The movie decides it wants to be _Aquaman_ instead, so we're getting an extended battle sequence of stuff fighting other stuff, with plenty of flashes, lasers and more stuff. It's big, it's loud, and I check out. Every cheesy crowdpleaser deserves its fair share of deus ex machina moments, but this movie spams the action movie trope of 'our main character is in peril only to get saved at the very last moment' to death at this point. Furthermore, the cringe comedy makes a big return, with [spoiler] Corey Stoll [/spoiler] delivering a line so bad that it will become a meme (you'll know once you see the movie). More punchy stuff, more pew pew, more 'comedy', and thankfully the movie finally decides it has wasted enough of my time. We get a final montage that includes the first good joke of the movie, and the credits roll. Nothing is achieved, absolutely nothing. This is a cynically conceived advertisement that does not deserve your time.

3/10
Like  -  Dislike  -  74
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by SkinnyFilmBuff
one year ago
@jordyep Hey! Read your review and thought it was well written and on point. If you don't mind me asking, how long does a review like this take you to write? I started writing comments/reviews about 18 months ago and I feel like it still takes me **way** too long, lol.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by Jordyep
one year ago
@skinnyfilmbuff Thank you! I think this one took about 15 minutes to write, which is mostly because I had organized my thoughts already in my head when I walked out of the screening. Some movies take a bit longer, especially the ones with like deeper themes and layers. It all depends on the movie, if it’s a generic action movie I usually don’t put in that much effort
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by rainertallinnast
one year ago
@jordyep i agree with more than half of what you say, yet gave it 8/10, while your score was only 3/10 - i wonder whether it's a difference in taste or rating logic, but i'm guessing it's a bit of both<br /> <br /> for example, i didn't mind at all that it was somewhat different in tone and style from the first one, although i'm not sure how much of edgar wright actually went into that one in the end<br /> <br /> i also don't really mind that the world kinda looks like spy kids - sure, it could have looked better, but i don't think it needed better design, just a bit more polish would have done the trick for me<br /> <br /> majors is awesome as kang, always nice to see douglas and pfeiffer in action, even bill murray has a cameo<br /> <br /> plus i loved all the weird inhabitants of the quantum realm<br /> <br /> for me, a 3/10 would be something that i already expected to be pretty bad, but then turned out to be even worse - something that i would be baffled even got a theatrical release, 2/10 would be something that i probably couldn't even finish and 1/10 is something i hope i'll never lay eyes on :D<br /> <br /> this one i really enjoyed, although it's far from perfect<br /> <br /> might have even given it a 7/10 if it were a hit, but with all the hate this movie is getting, upgraded it to an 8 :)
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by rickvaldez
10 months ago
I find the Cassie's Line way worse: "It's never to late to stop being a dick", I was about to turn off the movie
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Andre Gonzales
/10  7 months ago
Honestly this is easily my favorite out of the series. Still funny as normal but there's a lot more action and cool looking stuff in this movie. Really good movie.
Like  -  Dislike  -  0
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Per Gunnar Jonsson
/10  7 months ago
This one was quite good actually. Marvel is quite a bit of hit and miss lately. It all depends on whether one of the woke retards has gotten their grubby hands on the script or not.

It was of course encouraging that the woke “critics” on the well known rubbish site Rotten Tomatoes declared it rotten while it got a 82% score from the actual audience. Always a good sign for a movie.

The movie is a pure adventure movie meant to entertain the audience. The script is decent and, as usual with a Marvel movie, serves mainly to create a reason for doing action sequences and lots and lots of special effects.

The adventure is mixed in with some humor but it is generally okay and not overdone.

The scenery in the quantum world is fantastic and the creatures are great ranging from terrifying to quite fun. Bringing in Bill Murray was a nice surprise even though he was a bit of a bad guy and quite short lived.

The one character I really didn’t like was Paul Rudd as the Ant-Man. His anti-hero bullshit, reluctance to fight and generally being a douche until he was forced to actually do what was right was really grating on me.

Overall though this was some well spent two hours.
Like  -  Dislike  -  0
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Pcorn'n'Spectacle
/10  12 months ago
worst movie. Even that much money - too much btw - for special effects cant hide Reed's lacking effort to build a believable world. It's a poor and passionless visual copy of something like Star Wars Mini... with minimal humor and zero originality. RIP Marvel.
Like  -  Dislike  -  0
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top