Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Reviews for: Avengers: Age of Ultron

echelon_four
CONTAINS SPOILERS9/10  9 years ago
This movie is exactly as good as you think it will be.
Remember how you were wondering how they could pull off such an ambitious movie like the Avengers and then they did some how? Well that, but again, and it is still excellent.

(this review gets a little into details, but nothing really spoilery)

When Tony Stark, a man who thinks he is justified to do anything in the name of protection shockingly goes too far and creates Ultron, a murder bot who loves murder. Ultron, who is basically evil Tony, is very quippy. But this being a Whedon flick, everyone seems really quippy (don't worry, it's not as annoying as that sounds).

One of the best things about this movie is the destruction that you see happening in the action scenes. Something about the other Marvel movies never really made the people seem in danger when everything was exploding, but there are people everywhere in these scenes, screaming in horror as the super people punch the murder robots. Many innocent bystanders die in this one. Easy. Some of the other movies just seem too "clean", no sense of danger.

I also really liked the characters in this one. The other Marvel movies always seem like maybe one or two supporting characters from the other movies show up, but this movie has so many people in it. All your favourites!

Also, it had a really great "adventure continues" vibe. This movie starts with Avengers action and ends with Avengers action. There is no more "how they came together" or "this changes the very foundation of the universe". It was an awesome addition to what is now a serial story. More of this and less of origin stories!

So in conclusion, check out this sweet indie Whedon film, you might not have heard of it but it's pretty cool.
Like  -  Dislike  -  312
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by Redouaaane
9 years ago
This is not an indie movie, in fact, it's very much the extreme opposite of an indie movie..
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  10

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by echelon_four
9 years ago
Weird, I didn't see any ads for it anywhere...
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
julianpankratz
7/10  9 years ago
For an action/adventure/sci-fi flick, this was great. For a comic book adaptation? Decent. For a chapter in the MCU that, like the other projects, is supposed to connect everything? Average at best, if I'm both critical and 100% truthful. Whedon's culture erasure of the Maximoffs aside—and let's also push aside the in-your-face, out-of-the-blue Bruce and Natasha angle for the sake of a less nitpicky review—Age of Ultron was an... enjoyable film.

The action sequences and CGI were, as to be expected, Marvel-ous. Pun absolutely intended. (What I appreciated most of all about them was the emphasis on saving the civilians.) The banter was fun, despite the film's attempt at comedy feeling a bit stale and forced at times. The overall plot and tone of the movie were not as stellar as I had originally hoped, but they were still decent. Don't let my picking apart of the movie fool you, though; I DID like it. For the most part.

I think my only real problem with the movie is that the experience of watching it can only be described as seeing a canon divergence fanfic come to life on the big screen. I love fanfiction. I do. Just as much, I love the canon divergence spectrum of alternate universes in the world of fanfiction. I just think it doesn't belong on the big screen. Whedon isn't a big fan of Bucky, I'm aware of that much, but it doesn't excuse ignoring a large chunk of what happened in The Winter Soldier.

Oh well, right? Not much to be done about it. And it does pave the way for Civil War, so I suppose that IS a plus, all things considered.

In short: A isn't just for Avengers, it's for average.
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
sp1ti
5/10  9 years ago
I guess I'm contrarian when I look at all these high ratings but what ever.
The plus side is that there is more time with the 'characters' this time around as they're already "assembled" and the action scenes and CG is well done but that is all it's going to get.
The movie is long, really long - despite there being a gaping editing hole already. You still could cut an hour off this without loosing anything important though. It's depressing how something this shallow has been blown up like this.
How great is that we're getting superheroes instead of some other generic action movie. Let's just do all the standard stuff with CG anyways. Some yadadada in some slave country, a trip to Manhattan, South Africa and lets not forget a derailing train action scene in Korea. It's also quite dumb how random the powerlevels are in this (not that the group makes any sense like this anyways).
The big bad? The more he opened his mouth the worse it got. No one said anything about a degenerating A.I. His plan was shite and so was the execution but otherwise someone had to actually write a compelling story that is more than action sequences (or beepbeep to quote Black Widow). You better not be poking for holes in this as it's littered with them.
Too make matters worse the ending was actually the worst part. I don't think we need 20 scenes of them saving a family from the 10th floor or a lady out of her car when countless other people get fucking crushed. A sleazy guy like Stark is already the most popular one of the assemble anyways so why would anyone need confirmation that the guys are not evil? The fighting goes from one-shotting robots en masse, punching them a lot and even drop-kicking a single one - these guys sure are effective (it's amazing how much attention those copy paste robots get). I'm really glad tho that Captain America's spidey senses can feel the "waves" they're attacking in so he can do more drops.
Too bad the Marvel's circle-jerk isn't going to stop anytime soon (with Disney joining in). I rather have the other ones back because they do not get hyped like these movies so I can ignore them more easily. I wonder how many directors more they're going to burn down the road.
Like  -  Dislike  -  60
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
AndrewBloom
CONTAINS SPOILERS8/10  5 years ago
[7.8/10] “There is grace in their failings.” With those words, Joss Whedon writes the epitaph for his own film. That’s not to call *Avengers: Age of Ultron* a failure. It is, at worst, a quite good superhero film, full of spectacle and humor, character moments and solid thrills, and meaty, difficult ideas that, god help it, the movie never fully gets its hands around. But it tries. *Age of Ultron* is not as good a film as its nigh-flawlessly constructed predecessor, *The Avengers*, from three years earlier. But it’s arguably, at least on a standalone basis, a more ambitious one.

That ambition leads *Age of Ultron* to both good and bad places. It is undeniably an overstuffed film. The last big Marvel team-up had to service each of the six main Avengers plus a bad guy, and between mind control and prior introductions, somehow managed to pull off the task without ever seeming creaky. Here, on the other hand, Whedon and company have to come up with something new for each of those six heroes to do, plus introduce an entirely new bad guy, plus integrate three brand spanking new Avengers, plus set up a few more films, plus find key moments for the Shield team and the J.V. Avengers and a couple of never-before-seen side characters to join in on the fun. It’s just too much.

With those responsibilities, *Age of Ultron* quickly becomes bloated and breathless. It left me craving a director’s cut after my first watch back when the film was released. My hope was that, given final cut, Whedon would let some of these moments sit and excise others rather than forcing the audience to leap from thought to thought and scene to scene like The Hulk clambering through the Sokovian countryside.

And yet, I’m also grateful for all that we got and all that was attempted. *Age of Ultron* is a messy, complicated film because it wants to tackle a messy, complicated subject -- the fate and nature of humanity, and it wants to channel that through the fate and nature of its messy, complicated main character. On rewatch, it becomes clear that the film is about the best and worst of human beings, and the best and worst of Tony Stark in particular.

In the final act, it centers on a battle, and a meeting of the minds, between what amount to his two children. One, Ultron, represents the part of him that “doesn't know the difference between saving the world and destroying it”, who cuts a path of destruction out of his desire to protect the world, that constantly demands that he, and we, become stronger, safer, and better, until the whole project collapses under its own weight. The other, Vision, represents the part of him that values the sanctity of life and puts himself on the line to save it, that accepts and understands without judgment, that is, in a word, worthy. Internally and externally, the film is a clash between Tony’s hubris and self-sacrificing nature, his well-intentioned ingenuity and his destructive blind spots, his desire to build a better future and his mistakes in that effort that threaten it. We know, as we always know, which side will win out, but *Age of Ultron* does not elide the contradictions, and takes the tension between them seriously.

Despite the fact that it ends with the familiar uplifting theme, it is also a film about its heroes’ darkest fears and their irrevocable losses. It’s about Tony’s fear that if he stops, if he doesn't keep pushing, everything and everyone he loves will die. It’s about Steve Rogers facing the specter of the idyllic post-war life he’ll never have. It’s about Black Widow and Bruce Banner confronting whether any sort of affection or connection, with each other or anyone, can survive in the face of the monstrous things done to each of them. It’s about Hawkeye putting his life on the line and doing his job knowing that every time he steps out to fight some metal man on a flying city where his only weapon is a bow and arrow, it might leave his children without their father. It’s about Thor...trying to track down the Infinity Stones to prevent Ragnarok.

Okay, like with the movie writ large, not every one of these character focuses, or the execution of them, is perfect. But it embraces the darkness and hardship of these ideas without descending into the sturm und drang of its D.C. competition. As unbalanced and bumpy as *Age of Ultron* feels at times, it is a film committed to plumbing the shadowy depths of its characters and having those anxieties drive the action of the film, while still setting them off to crack laugh-worthy jokes and fight a horde of evil flying robots. That’s a lot to juggle, and as often as not, Whedon and company drop a few balls along the way, but the effort is a noble one.

The film’s biggest flaws mainly stem from the new figures introduced. Some of their problems are textural: Vision looks like a strange update of Slim Goodbody, Scarlet Witch joins Kendra de Vampieyer Slayeur in the hall of terrible Whedonverse accents, and Quicksilver seems like a mid-1990s aerobics instructor who moonlights in a boy band on weekends. But some of them are deeper. “The Twins” get a strong motivation that’s then barely ever serviced in the film and then switch sides on a dime. Vision speaks in the tritest of platitudes, and the well-setup trick with Thor’s hammer has to do a lot of the work for why we should care about him.

And then there’s the titular Ultron himself, who is a mixed bag. The notion of an Asimov-esque robot gone mad, wanting to take his mission to protect humanity so far that he threatens to destroy it, is a solid one. James Spader can match Robert Downey Jr. in on-screen loquaciousness, and the writing captures the sort of fumbling humanity in a being who resents it well. His self-made meteor plan even has some poetry and nice groundwork laid for it in the script. But the character’s also an enabler of Whedon’s most “too cute by half’ tendencies as a writer (with taunts that begin to wear as thin as The First’s once did) which I tend to enjoy, but still become exhausting after the nth monologue. Plus the swarm of evil robots doing evil robot things becomes static in a similar war after a while.

But at the same time, many things that irked me on my first go ‘round don’t bother me much here. It’s still odd that in his last outing, The Natasha/Bruce romance, which felt out of nowhere, is easier to swallow, even endearingly tragic, when you’re expecting it. Rather than cringing at the “five days til retirement” bits with Hawkeye, I can appreciate how the movie was headfaking its audience the entire time in a clever, knowing way. And while it’s still odd that, in his last outing, Tony blew up all his extra suits as a sign of character growth, but now relies on the Iron Legion, the sting of that disconnect and relapse fades when you haven’t just seen *Iron Man 3*.

That’s ultimately what *Age of Ultron* feels like: a relapse for Tony, but one that he recovers from. Scarlet Witch’s worst case scenario vision turns him back into the man who felt like he had to do everything himself, to take the world on his back in the hopes of having any peace. But his arc, as all team-up stories inevitably must fall back into, is him learning that they can accomplish the great good by working together. Ultron hopes to sow disharmony and distrust among The Avengers, and in any number of difficult moments, he succeeds. It’s becomes a legitimate question, for the audience and for Tony’s teammates, whether he’s an asset or another disaster waiting to happen.

But when there’s lives on the line, everyone sets that aside and works together. The best of humanity outweighs the worst of it, at least for now. Earth’s Mightiest Heroes spend as much time saving the innocent bystanders as they do going over the big metal megalomaniac threatening them. The parts of these beings that Vision sees, those better angels of natures, win out over the death and destruction we’ve wrought that convinced Ultron we needed to be replaced. The same goes for the film’s titular do-gooders, Tony included. It is a bumpy ride to get there, with too many characters, too many action sequences strung together, and too many stories than can be reliably serviced in two and a half hours. And yet when *Age of Ultron* fails, it fails nobly, which is all that one can ask a film, and all a film can ask of us.
Like  -  Dislike  -  30
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Hotsake
/10  6 years ago
There is a lot going on in this movie but it all just seemed kind of pointless and dull to me. Every now and then there would be a good scene or piece of dialogue but for the most part I felt myself getting bored and reaching for my phone to play Cribbage. I guess what I didn't like most is that it all felt like a big filler episode instead of an action packed character driven story arc.
Like  -  Dislike  -  0
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top