The Hollywood crowd loved to make movies in the 90s where Muslims were being "oppressed." However, just like the Crusades, they ignored the fact that it was retribution for what had happened prior.

The simple fact of a 2-Star Admiral being told something he wanted couldn't be accomplished was mind-blowing. After serving for 6 years in the Navy, I never saw a mere Captain not get exactly what he wanted, no matter what the situation. Having a Rear Admiral, in control of a Carrier Task Force, the most powerful naval force in the history of human civilization, wouldn't be so meek and accept defeat so quickly of interference with NATO.

Owen Wilson might not have been the right man for the role, but he did bring legitimacy to his part. Hackman is Oscar worthy once again. The plot is solid, the action keeps you on the edge of your seat and the errors are excusable. A popcorn worthy entertainment endeavor.

It was weird seeing Wilson in a serious role, but I'll pretty much watch any film featuring Gene Hackman. The strong points of the film were the action sequences and the cinematography. The photography was often beautiful and bleak. The camera work, however, was often obnoxious and seemed to use every cliched technique available at the time in the early 2000s, including slo-mo :facepalm: It almost felt like the movie was glorifying violence and death. Hmm ...

Also, that Wilson's character was able to survive and evade an entire unit of baddies for most of the movie stretched credulity to the breaking point. But flaws aside, I was entertained.

>"We're on another useless joyride at the cost of mere millions to the US taxpayer."

This is a very over the top war film with some very cheesy camera shots and a very serious Owen Wilson. I'll be damned if I didn't defend the jet scenes though. Oh, and it's based on an actual true story??

What hurts this entertaining movie. Is that it is based on a true story. Nothing in it feels realistic. Especially all of the bullet dodging.
Owen Wilson is good surprisingly. He didn’t need comedic lines in the beginning though. To come off like a Tom Cruise like hot shot. The real life person he is based on didn’t like that.

Poor choice for the lead. Unsurprisingly, Wilson is at his best when acting the goofball during the opening scenes. Darker moments once the film sets in become extremely poor thanks to his lacklustre acting chops.

The action on the ground once Burnett has been shot down is too John Woo for me, and this coupled with poor casting in the lead role ruins what could have been a great film about a war that is often overlooked in Hollywood (there were some awful atrocities during the conflict, which we only get to see a very small glimpse of here).

They should've given the lead role to Macht, and dialled down on the bullet-time scenes, it would've been a much better film for it.