Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Comments for: Charlie's Angels

darklove2501 says...
4 years ago
Not funny.
Not remarkable.
This is a sexist movie where all man are evils.
Like  -  Dislike  -  3001
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by jaw72
4 years ago
@darklove2501 Are you this scared of women in real life, or only online?
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  150

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
thici86 says...
4 years ago
Sometimes it's a good thing when you have your expectations very low, when I saw the trailer I think this was gonna be atrocious, but i think it was actually fun to watch and Kristen S. is really comfortable here. Plus, I really like Elizabeth Banks! The soundtrack is a win and the action scenes are also very good. Nothing remarkable, but it is entertaining.
Like  -  Dislike  -  1201
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by 143madalina
4 years ago
@thici86 did you watch the whole movie? if yes, please tell me how, because i can not
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
joshvaughn777 says...
4 years ago
I did not laugh one single time during this movie.
Like  -  Dislike  -  1100
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Heimdall77 says...
4 years ago
This is so awful it's embarrassing.
Banks has written a script so bad not even Patrick Stewart can deliver his lines convincingly.
Either the costume designer for this had a stroke or Banks simply raided her wardrobe from The Hunger Games franchise and the score is so insufferably dreadful the musical director should be beaten to death with his/her own limbs.
The whole thing is so juvenile I really think they missed the mark rating in at PG13 as that excludes most of the target audience.
Like  -  Dislike  -  600
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Saint Pauly says...
4 years ago
I almost liked _Charlie's Angels_... until I realized not disliking a film isn't the same thing as liking it.

I didn't expect to not dislike this as much as I didn't. (Yes, I know, welcome to my brain.) Elizabeth Banks turns out to be a very competent director and Kristen Stewart (who I usually find extremely overrated) proves she can actually smile, though I'd love for her to find at least one other voice register. I also appreciated the film's albeit heavy handed woman-power slant--it beats the hell out of the alternative.

The problem I had with the Angels is the story and the action. Both were well filmed, yet neither were terribly original. We've seen it all before, and either I'm more intelligent than anyone thinks or the twists were pretty obvious from the outset. Still, none of these drawbacks will prevent you from not disliking the movie!
Like  -  Dislike  -  300
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
comrade_mode says...
4 years ago
Even when the action and soundtrack was better,it was unenjoyable due to non-funny humours and laggy depthless story.
Like  -  Dislike  -  300
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
NotoriousX says...
4 years ago
Rebooting a movie, that was a reboot of an old TV-Show. When will Hollywood learn?

This was just really, really, bad. They took everything that was good with the TV series and the movies and flushed it down the toilet. No wonder Hollywood is going broke. No new ideas, just "updating" old franchises that don't need updating. What about coming up with something new for a change, instead of riding the success of others while trying to undermine their work.

No fun, no charm, no story to speak of, über cringy dialogue, and very, very unlikeable characters. Even the action scenes are stale. If someone would just take some competent writers and directors and give these women a chance on a real movie (Maybe a NEW franchise for a change), I'm sure they would shine, but in this piece of utter crap...they certainly don't.

Elizabeth Banks might be a decent actress, but a particularly good director and writer, she is not.

Wokeness is going to be the bane of Hollywood...
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
sophievdw says...
4 years ago
Telling that almost all of the bad reviews of this are written by men. Why is every movie about strong women, doing the things and have the cringy dialogue every mission impossible movie has, suddenly a ‘feminist’ movie? Is it a great movie? No, probably not. But it’s fun and if we can all admit that it’s just as decent as a lot of action movies with a male protagonist it will save everyone a lot of time and energy.
Like  -  Dislike  -  201
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by justgeekingby
3 years ago
@sophievdw Thank you for pointing out exactly what I was thinking when I saw all the comments.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  10

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
rastarr says...
4 years ago
wow that was a plain shitty movie. I seriously hope Elizabeth Banks never gets to direct another movie again
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Lee Brown Barrow Furness says...
4 years ago
I'm a fan of the old tv show, and even liked the slightly crappy rebooted show that came out a while ago. I even like the McG films from last decade. I hoped I would enjoy this film, but to be honest, it is a bit underwhelming. It tries too hard to be feminist. The action is weak. And the story is a bit of an uneven jumble. I will probably give it another go sometime, but Angels, you really do deserve better.
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top