Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Comments for: Don't Look Now

CinemanicBonkers says...
7 years ago
I looked, and I saw, and I was satisfied. A very strange film. Slow paced. Good cast. There's a remake on It's way, and I feel it needs one.
Like  -  Dislike  -  300
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
tarantinoel says...
5 years ago
Amazing filmmaking with an unsettling vibe. I dig it.
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
TvWatcha3 says...
3 years ago
3 Thoughts After Watching ‘Don’t Look Now’:

1. This movie was way too long. Tons of meaningless scenes and character interactions. Such an extraordinarily roundabout way of telling such a simple story.

2. Why did every character other than the couple seem duplicitous? The sisters, the bishop, the police. Were they all meant to be red herrings? If so, the effect was lost on me. I would say it was anticlimactic if there were any build-up whatsoever.

3. The best part about this film was Venice. A gorgeous city I’d love to visit and certainly an interesting setting for a horror-type film.
Like  -  Dislike  -  100
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
damnsquirrel says...
7 years ago
The whole film has a very off feel to it. opening scene does a nice job setting up the tone. About as slow a burn as you'll get, if you're reading this and HAVEN'T seen the trailer, stop reading and go watch the MOVIE. Alone. With the lights off.
Like  -  Dislike  -  100
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
AlfieSGD says...
4 months ago
If a drawn-out and rather explicit sex scene is the most interesting part of a psycho-thriller, then something is amiss. I know that "Don't Look Now" has its fans, but it didn't grab me at all. What did impress me a little bit were the sets, even though I found it irritating that Venice seemed unnaturally empty almost all the time. Overall, though, the movie bored me more than anything else, and I couldn't relate to Donald Sutherland's acting either. So all in all, this movie is quite a letdown, at least for my taste.
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
AdamMorgan says...
3 years ago
This is a great example of how much better movies are today. With the exception of the amazing The Conversation and a few others, I loathe the movies made in the 70's. Everything from the pacing to the dialog to the music just really sucks in ways that I can't put into words. I saw this film on Roger Ebert's "best of" list so I thought it would be worth a look. It turns out that it is the prototypical 70's movie. Hell, they couldn't even get the sex scene right (several minutes of watching the two leads roll around). Without saying too much, there were two ways the movie could have gone and this movie went the really crappy way. What a waste of time.

follow me at https://IHATEBadMovies.com or facebook I HATEBadMovies
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
The_Argentinian says...
4 years ago
If you watch it expecting a traditional horror movie, you'll be disappointed.
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
nmahoney416 says...
5 years ago
A weird slow burn of a movie. The ending and the sex scene make this worth watching.
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
danielmarmol says...
9 years ago
Breaking news: I loved its end!
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top