Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Comments for: Dunkirk

dioguinhubb says...
CONTAINS SPOILERS
7 years ago
The movie is told by the excellence in **editing**, **photography**, **score** (by Hans Zimmer) and **visual/practical effects**.
From the moment which the viewer notices that it is a non-linear narrative told in 3 (or more) points of view, the film becomes visceral, thrilling and captivating. It gives the sense of failure and weight on those soldiers' shoulders during the many days that they suffered from German's soldiers [spoiler] (which only appeared 2 seconds in the whole movie) [/spoiler]. You feel the human sacrifice, courage and fear that was on that beach, with all of the people waiting to their death or salvation. You experience and live the patriotism of the civilians which adventure themselves to the sea to rescue their own.
**Dunkirk is a singular masterpiece** that recreates one of the _miraculous_ periods of World War II.
Like  -  Dislike  -  2700
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
AgentDrTran says...
7 years ago
Fantastic film, but I'm noticing a trend with Nolan's movies where you can't hear a word anyone is saying. This movie has very little dialog but so much of it is almost unintelligible. Characters are shouting lines in thick accents with loud background audio.

I also feel like the plot got muddled at some points - What's happening in this scene? Who got shot down? What side are they? Who is this person? Was it the same person as before? I don't know, *almost all of the British soldiers look alike.* I went with many friends who also said they had these two issues.

That being said: the cinematography is stunning. There's some truly tense scenes in this film. It's well written, the multiple storylines fit together well and it seems pretty historically accurate, as much as it can be at least. The non-dialogue audio is absolutely spot-on, you must watch this in a theater with great surround sound. Interesting choices were made regarding the constant background of music/sound and I think it works incredibly well to set the mood of each scene. Overall it's a solid film but not my favorite.
Like  -  Dislike  -  2202
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by LordNPrior
7 years ago
@agentdrtran I agree with the Audio. I had the same issue with Interstellar as well. Had to wait until home release to watch with subtitles to make out what they were saying.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by Jordus
2 years ago
@agentdrtran In response to the end of paragraph 1 and all of 2, I feel like that's kind of the point. A lot of the young men are in fact similar, from different walks of life and thrown in to war. The horrific screeching of the planes, and the ear ringing impact of the explosions, it must've been deafening, confusing and terrifying. The thick accents is quite accurate as well I would imagine.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
gnotle says...
7 years ago
To each their own, but this movie felt like beating a dead horse. The directing and the characters are nice, but the story itself felt a little bit too shallow. I can see where the positive reviewers are coming from, but to me personally it was an O.K. movie, but no more.
Like  -  Dislike  -  1500
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Chloe131997 says...
8 years ago
really excited for this :D
Like  -  Dislike  -  1103
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by DarkKn1ght
7 years ago
Couple of days to go.. Reviews are coming in nicely :)
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  20

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by sidcrimson
7 years ago
@chloe131997 Same Here :) Just 8 Hours wait for me from now :p Gonna be super crazy IMAX experience!!
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  10

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by Chloe131997
7 years ago
@sidcrimson nice! i'm hopefully going to see it on monday...definitely one to watch in cinema!
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  10

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
thomas.a.roche says...
6 years ago
While the viewer could be excused for not knowing the event surroundings the evacuation of Dunkirk, Nolan took the approach of denying anything else than his idealized version of those events, with obvious inaccuracies that makes the film cringe-worthy at time, almost as bad as U-571. The rest of the time, the little action and almost non existent dialogues do very little to fill what could otherwise be a perfect setup for a contemplative film (see the Thin Red Line from Terrence Malick for an example). This is a big let down and I would rather watch another couple of Clint Eastwood or Mel Gibson war movie than this, which, although isn't intrinsically bad, isn't very good either.
Like  -  Dislike  -  1001
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by -Parzival-
8 months ago
I’m sorry but I fail to accept your point. I’ve read a lot about the evac of Dunkirk prior to watching this movie and even after fact checking parts of the movie I really can’t find any like obvious or major inaccuracies in this movie apart from inventing some characters. To state that Nolan „took the approach of denying anything else than his idealized version of those events[…]“ is just baffling to me. How did you get to that conclusion and where do you see your obvious inaccuracies? <br /> You don’t have to like the stylization of the movie but to say it’s inaccurate is from what I can see simply false.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
DRNKMNKY says...
CONTAINS SPOILERS
7 years ago
Watched Dunkirk at a movie theater and was disappointed: without knowing anything about the movie besides that Christopher Nolan has produced it and that it was a WWII movie, I hoped to see something with a brilliant story like "The Dark Knight" or "Memento". [spoiler]That is not the case here, there is not match to be had here storywiese (however, it is accurate historically according to: http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2017/07/20/what_s_fact_and_what_s_fiction_in_dunkirk.html).
From a technical point of view, Dunkirk is a good if not even great flick: good acting, minimalistic but great / creepy soundtrack and bombastic sound effects. You have to be at a cinema to feel those bullets fly, the motors of the Spitfires howl or the torpedo hit in your guts! Wow!!! Additionally it manages to make you really fear for the life of the soldiers from the get go to and there is this certain claustrophobic feeling about it throughout the whole time.
While Dunkirk reminded me again of the cruelty of war and how happy and thankful all of us, who live in western Europe, should be that there is currently now open war raging here, I still found the movie lacking and wished for a much better plot.[/spoiler]
Like  -  Dislike  -  901
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by xaliber
7 years ago
@drnkmnky I see this film like The Revenant. Fantastic cinematography, excellent use of score and sound effect, but no depth in the story.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  10

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Erulezz says...
7 years ago
In one word: AMAZING

Watched this last night on IMAX. Really unique. The dogfights in the air were incredible. And that sound... i almost shaked off my seat :)
Like  -  Dislike  -  600
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Opulous says...
7 years ago
Superb sound effects and cinematography, but lacks a real plot. You have to watch it just for the experience, not for the storyline.
Like  -  Dislike  -  500
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Mikeycrdz says...
6 years ago
This film wasn’t for me....directing, editing, visiual effects were amazing but just wasn’t for me.....i was bored and wanted it to end
Like  -  Dislike  -  500
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top