Really? No..really?!
I didn't read the book, but i doubt it that the book is a mess, as this movie was.
The script is really confusing, making the story confusing aswell. The actors...ohh my god. What were they thinking?
The movie is a mess, with actors making 'question mark' faces all the time.

Ps: Worst leading lady EVER. Even worst than Kirsten Stewart.

It’s like a drug

If you're looking for a love story with angels, watch City of Angels (the original, not the 1998 remake). This sub-Twilight nonsense is bad, and a real disappointment from the usually reliable Scott Hicks (Shine). Woeful dialogue, bad acting, and a sudden ending means this movie descends into the depths, rather than attaining salvation.

I loved the story line and plot! This movie made me want to read the books as I'm sure the cheesy acting and "Twilight" sense was obvious throughout the whole film. Daniel's weird, long, stalker-like glares were a little weird to say the least I can see this being a favorite for young teens as it meets all the criteria. But as an adult, you should just be prepared for this type of teenage film and you won't be that disappointing. The ending was probably one of the worst I have ever seen, ending very abruptly without much explanation. I had to look up what happened to the character's in the book because the film did a very poor job at explaining.

A Twilight wannabe, Fallen is a generic tween fantasy thriller that’s dreadfully boring. The story follows a troubled teen named Lucinda Price who’s sent to a special boarding school where she meets a brooding young man that she instantly falls for, and she begins to believe that they’ve met before…perhaps in a previous life. Addison Timlin does alright as the lead, but really isn’t given much to work with. The writing is incredibly bad, telegraphing the whole plot from the jump and delivering incredibly clichéd dialog. Still, the film has an interesting artistic look and the score does a good job at setting a dramatic tone. While Fallen shows some potential as a series, this first installment plays as a poorly made Twilight rip-off.

Books are good but this is slow and uninteresting. Not to mentions lots of time just to go nowhere.

I have not read the books but I am sure they are better than this poor film. It was oh so predictable and like in a previous comment everything looked forced and had no flow. The only thing I liked was the music. However, I really enjoyed Fallen (2006) from the novels by Tom Sniegoski even though I did not read the books either, this miniseries was far better than this crap.

I always have trouble with the books into movies because they never love up to the hype of the books. With this book, I already had some issues with the book itself so that didn't bode well for the movie. But even a bad book can become a good movie if done well. But, as with most books into movies, it was overly dramatic. A book can take 10 pages on one scene because of all the details it includes but a movie should not take 5 minutes on one bad kissing scene. Take the book and make it realistic rather than playing out all the sappy details of the book. And so much was skimmed over or happened in the background. All the fighting seemed fast forwarded because it was over in less than 5 minutes. When the two boys are fighting over Luce, their voices are in the background and they're just yelling over each other. All the boring things were drawn out and all the potentially exciting scenes were brushed over.

This movie had me so excited cool concept. I wish the [spoiler] ending had of been a bit more descripted though.