Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Comments for: Fear Street: 1666

Lee Brown Barrow says...
3 years ago
A satisfying end to what has been a pretty good horror trilogy. Sure, it played out like an extended episode of Scooby Doo but thanks to the creative talents behind the movie, this didn’t hurt it at all.
Like  -  Dislike  -  701
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by Ockaie
3 years ago
@lee-brown-barrow Watching 1666 felt different watching 1994 Part 2 and it wasn't cos it was like 300 years apart. The cinematic storytelling felt more serious. I don't know how to describe it, not very good with words.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
brunoliv says...
CONTAINS SPOILERS
3 years ago
yeah... so... it's a ok movie there is a lot of problems [spoiler] like... WHY THE F*CK did you leave a cursed book that can ruins an entire city on the cave? seriously that NO ONE of the FIVE PEOPLE thought : humm.. maybe we shoul take that book and burn or secure somewhere else. [/spoiler] yeah yeah... movie script to maybe a sequel.
Like  -  Dislike  -  702
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by NealZ
3 years ago
@brunoliv maybe on of those people took it in the end. we dont know who it was :D
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by brunoliv
3 years ago
@nealz yeah, sure, but... why the police after investigating the crime scene just leave the book behind? that's is kinda implausible...<br /> the important thing is: the trilogy was fun to watch, it entretained me and I want a new story. :D
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reiko_LJ says...
CONTAINS SPOILERS
3 years ago
Closed out the trilogy well enough. Just a shame it took 300+ years for Sarah to get revenge. The end of the 1666 section was so hard to watch. Had enough of women, queer women especially being trodden over for the plot.
Was a nice twist to have Sarah not be the real evil in it all and both the wlw survived! (in 1994 anyway...)
Like  -  Dislike  -  300
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
CorsOfLuke says...
CONTAINS SPOILERS
3 years ago
I love the twist and the worldbuilding of this trilogy. Fear Street: 1666 was a satisfying ending to a surprisingly entertaining and solid trilogy. Goode was evil :))
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Miratrix says...
CONTAINS SPOILERS
3 years ago
It was good, if not a bit predictable.

[spoiler] I don't think investigators would just leave evidence at a crime scene like that though but WHY THE HECK WOULD THEY LEAVE THE BOOK IN THE FIRST PLACE?! [/spoiler]

I enjoyed the trilogy. I would watch more Fear Street movies.
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
moep0r says...
3 years ago
I don't know why but I really disliked most of the story part that was told in 1666. It might be the time period itself, or all the mysogyny and witch hunting that's going on (which is needed to have a pay off and explain the lore, etc but well). I really liked the second half(?) of the movie though. It's a nice closure to the trilogy and all in all I'm happy how it turned out. Would recommend.
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
JimDarko says...
3 years ago
Solid trilogy all around and a nice, edgy entry into what I would think would be “gateway horror” for a lot of young folks out there. I wish this installment was a little spookier and played a bit more with the time period but this is all about tying up those loose ends and explaining the lore. Everything pays off nicely and we finally get justice for Sarah Fier, who IMO deserved it more than Han this year.
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
CinemanicBonkers  says...
3 years ago
Well fear street has come to an end and all mysteries have been answered and I’ve loved every minute of it and part 3 is by far my favourite and great job from all the cast involved, definitely a fun watch. I’d happily welcome more parts XD
Like  -  Dislike  -  100
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
angel1online says...
3 years ago
I enjoyed the trilogy, the second was my favourite and the first half of the 3rd film.

It had its ups and downs, but overall enjoyable to watch.

Certainly something different to have a story in 3 films, which were released about a month apart. I also enjoyed that they had a twist which wasn’t revealed until almost half way through the finale.

My main gripe is the parts in modern day, didn’t match up to standards with the rest, it was more childish and satire and I wasn’t sure if they remembered who the target audience was. I felt like I was watching something completely different and not connected to the rest.

Overall, I’d still recommend watching.

My ratings for each of the trilogy:

1) 1994 - 7
2) 1978 - 8
3) 1966 - 1st half 8 - 2nd half 7
Like  -  Dislike  -  100
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
The_Argentinian says...
3 years ago
I knew that changing the setting would be divisive but I much preferred the first half to the goofy Home Alone ending.
Like  -  Dislike  -  100
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
miguelreina says...
3 years ago
[Netflix] The trilogy tribute to the slasher closes with a political reformulation that establishes the basis of current terror in the oppression of the past. In this sense, 1666 manages to get rid of simple imitation to establish its own path. With some flaws (those accents!), the connection between 1666 and 1994 leaves 1978 isolated, inconsistent. But it's possibly the coolest proposal in the horror genre this year.
Like  -  Dislike  -  100
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
csrz says...
3 years ago
Wow! I didn't expect this one to be good because how mediocre the first two films are, but this one absolutely delivers. Surprisingly, it stuck the landing for the trilogy really well. My main problem is it can't stand on its own and the structure in this one is like watching two films mashed together, we got 1666 filling the first hour and the rest of the film is the second part of 1994 but I appreciate the effort. Honestly I don't think the 1666 part is executed really well, could've put more effort into it but the backstory is interesting enough for me to keep watching. The second part of 1994 though, it's filled with suspense and packed with so much fun. The reveal is too predictable but I enjoy it all the same. I appreciate this one the most. I think it's a great ending to wrap it all up.
Like  -  Dislike  -  100
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
drtfx7 says...
3 years ago
Fear Street Part Three: 1666 continues in the same vein of the previous movies with a decent plot and lots of gore churned into an enjoyable thriller. Imagining the same actors in past characters was a good choice instead of introducing new ones, created a leeway for the movie to ignore establishing characters and jump right into the plot without making it uninteresting. The big payoff in the end is satisfying enough after spending three movies to earn it.
Like  -  Dislike  -  101
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by ruegnueg
3 years ago
@drtfx7 lots of gore? Where? Must've missed that
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
TvWatcha3 says...
3 years ago
3 Thoughts After Watching ‘Fear Street: 1666’:

1. For the first 20 minutes of this final entry, I honestly wasn’t sure I’d be happy with the direction they were taking everything. I eventually realized how stupid I was.

2. I haven’t been this excited about a horror franchise in a very long time. Literally can’t remember when the last time was. So excited for more!

3. I truly didn’t see the entire twist coming. And it wasn’t just a twist for twist sake. It was earned. It was thought out. And everything came together beautifully.

Bonus Thought: Great cast! Great characters! Great music!
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
weirdworld says...
CONTAINS SPOILERS
3 years ago
[Spoiler]Makes you wonder if it was the men that practice witchery during the witch-hunt

Felt like 1994 was repeating 1666 in some aspect but well...history tends to repeat[/spoiler]
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Jim222001 says...
CONTAINS SPOILERS
3 years ago
The 1666 is pretty dark and humorless. With the second half more fun. I saw it coming that Solomon was bad though. Without realizing he was Nick’s ancestor.
It would have been nice if Nick was actually good. Since I shipped him and Berman, I never actually thought that he may be bad.
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
+schmoogie says...
3 years ago
You can also think of the 3 Fear Street movies as a 6 episode limited series.

1994 - is basically an homage to the movie Scream and starts asking all sorts of questions that are answered in the 2 follow-up movies.
1978 - is essentially an homage to Friday The 13th and is a proper slasher film.
1666 - answers all the questions we had and some we didn't even think about.

In other words, the story we thought we were watching in 1994 and 1978 suddenly takes a turn and 1666 gives us a whole new story. In hindsight, the clues were there.

How I rate:
1-3 :heart: = seriously! don't waste your time
4-6 :heart: = you may or may not enjoy this
7-8 :heart: = I expect you will like this too
9-10 :heart: = movies and TV shows I really love!
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
T.Cash says...
3 years ago
Deena does a great Marlon Brando impression
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top