So this time I was able to pay attention to the movie the whole way through. I didn't have the same problems like my last film I reviewed. However, there was some time where I thought I was getting a little bored with the film. Specifically, I'm talking about the sequence where they hang out with a couple German women and, uh, enjoy themselves. It went so long that I was totally sick with it and wanted it to end. BUT... then the end of that sequence made me feel like it was all worth it. I don't hold that agains the movie at all.

Also, I didn't really like any of the characters (except one, I'll get to it) in the beginning. They were all kind of jerks, but then throughout the film you start to go over to them, just like the main character's arc. As for the one character I liked the whole time though, I can't believe it was Shia LaBeouf. I loved his character the whole time. Never would have thought that would be the case.

Fury sucks. Okay, most of the movie was actually alright, but then the protagonist rapes someone in what is meant to be a tender moment. Hurr, I bet somebody being forced into a bedroom by two soldiers with guns can definitely give consent. And then Brad Pitt's character's depicted as this great leader who keeps this ragtag group in check by forcing them to shoot unarmed POWs and as this gentleman by threatening to rape someone and swapping plates instead of just telling the men who he's in charge of to stop being assholes. What fantastic leadership skills, what a true war hero. Of course, war itself may not be glorified in this movie, but Pitt's character definitely is; Pitt himself said that it helped him become a better father. And then ending happened and hahaha, that means the Americans in this movie are literally worse than Nazis. The action was bad, it was just this huge cacophony and colour-coded tracer bullets that looked like light beams from Star Wars. The sound mixing was pretty muddy but that's probably the screener's fault.

Fury actually begins quite good. It isn't uncommon for war movies to reduce "realism". So it is rather the standard that enemy forces attack just in the right size, so that the heroes can take care of them. We wouldn't want enemy PAKs and Panzerfäuste to attack organized, all at once from different sides, wouldn't we?
I might even accept the shallow characters, trying to represent the result of their harsh experiences.
[spoiler]I could even accept the fictional scenario that a Tiger would engage a battle all on its own, so that "Fury" could prove its point of Americans fighting a technically superior opponent.[/spoiler]
But the final battle ... I don't know, I think that's how you insult the intelligence of your customers.

Watched this last night, and wow still thinking about it the next day. Fantastic acting all round. Really hits home what the final months of WWII were like. I have never been a fan of war films but this one blew my mind.

A great movie and Brad Pitt at his finest

one of my favorite movies i liked that short love story :p

There's nothing very original about "Fury", but it's a tight, engrossing war film with decent action and characters that you care about.

_Fury_ is without a doubt one of the best WWII films ever made, joining the ranks of the iconic _Saving Private Ryan_. Pitt's performance is outstanding, as he brings to life a complex and multi-dimensional character who is tough, fearless, and deeply human. The supporting cast is also excellent, with each actor delivering a memorable and powerful performance. The cinematography in _Fury_ is absolutely stunning and captures the intensity and brutality of tank warfare. From the epic battle scenes to the haunting landscapes, every shot in the movie is a work of art. Overall, a powerful tribute to the bravery and sacrifice of those who fought in WWII, and a testament to the enduring power of the human spirit in the face of unimaginable hardship.

Fury is a ferociously gory, gut-wrenching world war II film that redefines the atrocities of many misfortunes during the times. With an outstanding cast, gorgeous cinematography, and a claustrophobic tank as one of the characters, Fury is one fine war film to experience. The foreboding atmosphere and supreme action scenes make it one of my favorite war flick of all time.

Telegram : @streamgenx
Full Reviews :
www.instagram.com/stream.genx

If war ever had a face, it will be ugly.

"Fury" is a movie that shows what it needs to show, and that is the brutal and hard things in war and how it effect's people.

The use of sound in this movie when the bombs go off or the sound of shoot outs, it sounded so real and loud. I got to give the guy who did the sound in this movie a thumps up for that.

Brad Pitt plays the broken but tough Wardaddy, and he is the kind of character that you can see all the pain and stress in his eyes, as he has been through wars that will scar a person for life. Logan Lerman did a good job as well. He was great in this movie better than those Percy Jackson films. But there is this one actor in this movie that I've got to say that this is best performance yet, and that is Shia LaBeouf, yes he may went crazy last year and early this year, but in this movie he did a fantastic job.

Overall rating: Fury is the most brutal and hard hitting war drama since "Saving Private Ryan".

Great movie, with suspense.

I do not know good or bad , look at the first！
我不知道好不好看，看看先！

The boy who lived, 2.0.

Great movie i don't know how i hadn't seen this so far. 8.3/10