This entire movie consists of nothing more than the opening and closing of doors. Pay attention, it's really comical.

I watched Insidious, and to be honest, it was awful. However, if you watch this IMMEDIATELY afterwards, it makes WAY more cohesive sense. Insidious: 4/10, Insidious 2: 6/10 but Insidious 1+2: 8/10

The tip is to definitely watch this one right after watching the first instalment, trust me it makes a lot more sense and you can follow the storyline better. Think I actually preferred this one to the first, purely because it tied up all the things you wanted to know from the first film that were left unanswered.

I liked this more than the first one because it didn't have Darth Maul and neatly followed and closed the first movie's story.

"Insidious 2" tested my patience. It tried to be scary and thrilling but was neither. It was, however, a convoluted mess with characters that were boring. The whole movie was nothing more than people peering into rooms, opening creaking doors, and making scary faces. It couldn't even execute a successful jump scare (which I hate). Oh, and it was impossible to follow because it kept hopping between the real world and a dream world where the dead live in purgatory, or something like that. And yes, I have seen the first "Insidious".

Prepare for lots of dirty rooms and dry ice but zero scares.

James Wan is the master.Saw it again after five years and i enjoyed every minute of it like the first time.Really creepy with good story and crazy directing. 10/10

'Insidious: Chapter 2' keeps the level of the film series so far to a suitable level, though it is some way off its predecessor.

The film, as you'd probably expect, relies heavily on the 2010 production, with quite a few reused scenes from it - even some from early in this one, too. It is with good reason, as it splices fairly well into what occurs here. I think they do try a little too hard with it in parts, though all in all it comes out decently.

They sideline Rose Byrne for a lot of this, which is disappointing given she's arguably the best at acting of those involved. I assume it's down to scheduling conflicts with other commitments, if so it's nice she still appears.

Due to the aforementioned, Patrick Wilson takes centre stage - not to great appraisal unfortunately. I find his performance quite inferior, at least compared to the one he gives in 'Insidious'. None of the others stand out, though I do appreciate them retaining the same onscreen people.

This is certainly a step down, but it is still a more than solid effort.

For me this sequel is a lot worse than first part. While the first movie focused on creating subtle creepy atmosphere this one here is more like the typcical cliche horror flick. Just watched it to get the trilogy "done".

James Wan continues his tale of horror with Insidious: Chapter 2. Picking up where the first film left off, the Lamberts find that they continue to be plagued by paranormal disturbances, and start to suspect that something may have come back from the Further when they touched the astral plane. The story gets pretty crazy, constantly introducing new elements (such as time travel) into the mythos. And at times this works in the film’s favor by creating an air of unpredictability. But on the whole, Insidious: Chapter 2 is a mess that gets by mostly on some intense action and an entertaining mystery.

Generally, sequels are not as good as the original, but this is. Undecided if I prefer this to the original.

Both excellent paranormal horror films, in comparison to the majority.

If you love ghosts, then you will enjoy this.

Who ya gonna call?? Nobody stfu

Nonsensical. Not scary. Not good.