Fun movie, but the story wasn't all that good. I liked it more when I saw it the first time. I took a chance and read the book, and it was much better. The movie works well enough as a movie, but if you're looking for a better story than this, read the book.

Fantastic storyline and cinematography but the worst acting ever!!

When i go to the movies i want to be entertained, this movie certainly did that!! Check it out and don't forget the popcorn!!!

we need part 2 in 2024 it's a fun to watch .

Jumper was my boyfriend's movie pick, and I had no idea what to expect. Surprisingly, I really enjoyed it! The concept of teleportation and the action-packed storyline kept me hooked. It's not my typical choice, but it turned out to be a great movie night! :smile::popcorn:

Ok plot but not a particularly likeable main character.

Could've been a masterpiece with better acting and better story. It's a shame.

The idea was decent, but the acting sucked

The plot and characters were kind of a clusterfuck, but I will admit it wasn't boring and had *potential* themes going on instead of just going places real quick.

It was good but not magnificent.

Hayden is hot, but this is one of the most obnoxious protagonist I'ave watched. The flashy idea of JUMPING ability is really cool, but the story is really poorly written, especially the storyline between adult David and Millie.

on the upside:
+ interesting from start to finish
+ jumping scenes are well done, believable and cool
+ good visual effects, scenery, story

on the downside:
- cringeworthy dialogue at times.
- It remained a mystery on how his ability remained hidden from the public eye. Made no sense & bothered me.

Overall a very decent movie worth a watch. But doesn't leave a big, lasting impression.

2/14/08 2/14/08 21408 Never forget

A great idea becomes just another action movie. The main character David has the ability to transport himself anywhere he wants. The teleportation effect is well done and made me curious to find out just what someone would do with such power. Unfortunately, "Jumper" turns into some battle between "Jumpers" and "Paladins" that has been going on for thousands of years.

There is an awful lot of quick cuts and jumpy camera work here (no pun intended), not unlike the Jason Bourne movies. Samuel Jackson's "Roland" character was underdeveloped, too.

Level "Interesting" • 7 :heart: • Entertaining and Good.

A visually fun movie that, in spite of the fact uses help from the author of the book it's based on, kinda misses the point of the book. The narrative is clumsy but so darn entertaining to look at you can almost forget. Doug Liman is a truely "fun" director. Even at this point he's responsible for some of the most stylish movies. Fun, splashy affairs like _Mr. and Mrs. Smith_, and _The Bourne Identity_.He goes on further to do things like _Edge of Tomorrow_, _Impulse_ and_Chaos Walking_ and as poorly a film as Chaos Walking is, it's not that bad to look at. Visually these are movies that give _Limitless_ a run for it's money.

If you ever get a change to read the book that inspired it or the book they wrote to get inspired for the movie or the sequel to the original book. They're a much better narrative.