Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Comments for: M

christopher_brink says...
11 years ago
Lang really was a master with the camera, capturing some amazing shots--particularly of Lorre's reactive reflection. Lorre, himself, delivers a chilling performance that is unmatched in his English-language work. While the silences are almost deafening, I will never hear "In the Hall Of the Mountain King" the same way again.
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Jordyep says...
4 months ago
Well deserved classic, a perfect film. Really fantastic, clever script about the nature of justice that functions within the confines of the noir genre. Masterful use of sound and visuals by Fritz Lang, technically it feels very ahead of its time but it’s also very pronounced stylistically. The acting styles and dialogue don’t just feel like they’re from this time period, they feel specific to this film. I’d love to write an in depth analysis about this one someday, but considering that so many papers have already been written about it, I don’t think I could bring much to the table in terms of original thoughts. Just take a chance on it if you’re unsure; don’t let it being a German black and white film scare you away from seeing it.

9.5/10
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Cluisanna says...
5 years ago
One of my favourite films. Despite its age I get choked up by so many scenes, especially the first ("Elsie?!") and last ones and the blind beggar with the balloon. And while it has a very dark subject matter, this movie is quite hopeful in a way - seeing the city come together to protect its children is strangely comforting - though the ending is rather ambiguously grim in a way. Plus, it's interesting to see how much Berlin has changed and how much it hasn't - especially the dialect.
Like  -  Dislike  -  100
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
nmahoney416 says...
6 years ago
It holds up well today and is still somewhat relevant. Peter Lorre is great and has an amazing scene near the end. The cinematography is fantastic and there are a lot of amazing shots. The sound is really good too, the use of complete silence really makes me feel uneasy. Definitely worth watching.
Like  -  Dislike  -  100
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
wambie says...
3 years ago
Stop snoring, you'll wake up the lice!
Like  -  Dislike  -  100
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
S26N says...
10 months ago
Underworld chasing the notorious serial killer- it was an intriguing story to follow.It gave a unique perspective to the movie which I believe kept me attached to it.In and all, it depicted something serious like the tailing of a serial killer in a wholesome way and that makes it worth watching.
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
JoeyvanAwesome says...
7 months ago
It’s an accomplishment in itself that a German movie doesn’t get on my nerves. I like the story, but I didn’t found it particularly exciting. It gets a bit more interesting in the second half, with some good (albeit over the top) performances. I wouldn’t even call it a thriller, to be honest. Is it exceptional? For me, no, but it’s fine.
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
LNero says...
3 years ago
It's a classic for a reason, but it doesn't work as well today as it must have then. The buildup is great, and it was good cinematography for its time, but the kind of overwrought theatre-like acting by Peter Lorre in the end (while an impressive performance) is a relic of serious dramatic film's awkward growth phase. People screaming into the camera doesn't really work that well anymore. Likewise, the abrupt and contrastingly matter-of-fact ending was obviously supposed to be a door slam ending with the strength of its curt message, but just feels lost in time now, with little impact.

Still, subjective 7/10, and I don't really have any desire to watch it again, unlike, say, _Laura_ (more entertaining despite not being spectacular, or _Casablanca_ .)
Like  -  Dislike  -  004
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by The_Argentinian
3 years ago
@lnero nonsense. As powerful today as it was when it came out.<br /> Also, if you are going to judge performances from that era by today's standards, you're going to dislike a lot of classic movies. <br /> (not that there's anything wrong with M's perfume. Joaquin Phoenix just won an Oscar for Joker, ffs!)
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by LNero
3 years ago
@the_argentinian I think that really depends on the culture, and partly personality. Perhaps if I had been born in Argentina I'd agree with you. I'm only saying that for me it didn't work, but that it was a great performance. Every review either judges based upon what they guess would make it good, historically, or how well it works now. I mainly use this space for my opinion on how well something works today.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by The_Argentinian
3 years ago
@lnero &gt; I think that really depends on the culture, and partly personality. Perhaps if I had been born in Argentina I'd agree with you.<br /> <br /> WTF?
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by LNero
3 years ago
@the_argentinian What? It's just as I said. Your culture determines what you consider to be normal or strange, or even palatable. So does one's personality.<br /> <br /> For example, German films and series tend to have a completely different sense of humor than, say, British, or American. I don't think most Americans would get German humor, but I appreciate its dry subtlety. Most "serious" American TV shows I consider to be hyperbolic and stupid. Shows I've seen made in Spain seem to be overdramatic and melodramatic. Still, I enjoy _La Casa De Papel_ despite that. <br /> <br /> A lot of people get bored with slowly paced films with long establishing shots, and subtle character drama. Films like that are among my favorites. That seems to mainly be dependent upon personality. On the other side of that I find extreme emotional displays to be disturbing and hard to watch.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
fjordic says...
3 years ago
Such a fascinating movie on so many levels.

Themes (tone, impact) 1
Acting and characters 1
Story (writing, direction, pacing) 1
Aesthetic (sets, special effects, score) 1
Enjoyment 1
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
2016moonlight says...
4 years ago
**A challenge to watch the most popular film on letterboxd from each year, starting from 1930** :film_frames:

1931 - _M_ is noticeably an achievement in filmmaking for its time, and an important watch for anyone who loves the 7th art. The attention to detail is great. I have to say though, the lack of music and the slow pace made it hard to grab my attention and I was lulled to sleep a few times, but i made the effort to finish it, because there are certain movies that you just simply need to know so you can better appreciate everything that came after them!
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
OffbeatParadox says...
2 years ago
**An absolute pleasure to watch. Keeps you on your toes from beginning to end.**
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
soonertbone says...
one year ago
Strange, not at all what I remembered after 10 years. Upon rewatch, this struck me as a pure procedural--we follow the police and a band of criminals all working toward finding Hans Beckert, a serial killer. It was the latter that stood out in my mind--Peter Lorre's performance gets under your skin and I think he brilliantly plays a man in crisis. I didn't find the procedural elements as compelling and I think they could have been edited down slightly, but there are many elements in the film that really worked: the use of sound, the mirror motif, and the interrogation of the role of the state in meting out punishment. Would be curious to read a lot more about the political context Lang was critiquing.
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top