Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Reviews for: Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest

AndrewBloom
CONTAINS SPOILERS6/10  4 years ago
[6.1/10] The glory of the original *Pirates of the Caribbean* movie is that it took itself just seriously enough, without taking itself too seriously. There was enough action and drama for there to be stakes, but also enough humor and levity to make it a fun romp of a film. It left room for more stories, but it also worked as its own thing, with scenes and motivations that built on one another.

*Dead Man’s Chest* throws all of that out the porthole. Suddenly, the *Pirates* franchise now has epic lore involving souped up versions of the antagonists from the last movie, with grave implications for every new development. The humor is reduced to the broadest of shtick and takes a backseat to tedious speechifying about destiny and the “true nature” of this or that character. And the movie is a fifteen-car-pileup of plots and callbacks and character beats, stopping not because the film’s reached any kind of natural endpoint or even intermission, but because that’s just where director Gore Verbinski and his team happened to hit the pause button.

About the only good element that survives from *Curse of the Black Pearl* into *Dead Man’s Chest* is the production design and effects. Say what you will about the movie’s contrived reasons for sending our heroes dotting across the map, but it at least finds some scenic locales to shoot them in. Likewise, Davy Jones, while showing a bit of age as an effect, is still a marvel of on-screen wizardry, able to move with weight and have distinctive expressions as he interacts with the flesh and blood characters. His ship shares the same realness and creativity of design, a waterlogged battleship that looks appropriately worn by both time and the sea.

And yet, even there, the visuals are hit or miss. While Jones himself is convincing and Bootstrap Bill has a distinctive look, the rest of the crew of the Flying Dutchmen feature unique designs but dodgy looking CGI realizations. The famed kraken is poorly composited into the live action sequences, making our heroes appear as though they’re fighting a big cartoon character rather than a threatening piece of calamari. What’s more, in places like the waterwheel fight or Jack’s own standoff with the kraken, the green screen effects are painfully obvious, breaking immersion.

All of that could be forgivable, especially for 2006, if trifling things like plot and character and motivation were better than “mildly passable.” In contrast to the thrill-heavy clarity of *Curse of the Black Pearl*, this sequel is convoluted and overstuffed. Nowhere is that more evident than in how many MacGuffins there are in a single two-and-a-half hour film.

There’s Davy Jones’s heart. Then there’s the chest that holds Davy Jones’s heart. Then there’s the key that opens the chest that holds Davy Jones’s heart. Then there’s the drawing of the key that opens the chest that holds Davy Jones heart. And that’s before you get to the jar of dirt that might hide Davy Jones heart, or the compass that might lead you to Davy Jones’s heart, or the letters of mark that you might be able to bargain for Davy Jones’s heart. This film has no shortage of random, mostly uninteresting objects that various characters are after in various combinations, with only clumsy throughlines for how one leads to another.

That extends to the characters’ wants and goals here. Again, in the original film, each major character had a fairly straightforward but nevertheless strong motivation. *Dead Man’s Chest*, by contrast, makes an utter hash of it. Beyond just the endless quest for the various MacGuffins, who’s trying to rescue whom or sell off somebody to somebody else, or get back into a random third party’s good graces becomes bewildering at some point.

Even for a bloated, two-movie narrative, there’s just too many characters with too many objectives here. Will Turner wants to save Elizabeth Swann again, except he gets sidetracked with a promise to his dad. Former Commodore Norrington is back despite not really having a place in the story, and is gunning for redemption or at least a chit he can use to regain his former stature. Two new villains, and their seconds, and Will’s dad, and Elizabeth’s dad, and the old pirate crew, and the voodoo priestess, and more familiar faces still each have to get their moment in the sun with jumbled up schemes and wishes. Even Jack, the last film’s agent of chaos, is torn between trying to hold off Davy Jones’s claim on his soul and pursuing Elizabeth himself.

Therein lies arguably the worst element of the film. Depp’s Sparrow was an entertaining side dish in the first movie, but here, after so much fanfare and adoration over his performance, he becomes not only the main course, but a romantic lead. Not only does his shtick wear much thinner when it’s the focus rather than one piece among many, but Verbinski and the writers feel compelled to inject a needless love triangle to ensnare Jack, Elizabeth, and Will, despite it adding nothing to the proceedings.

Needless addition is the unofficial theme of *Dead Man’s Chest*: more plots, more characters, more power plays, and more overextended (and sometimes shockingly racist) action sequences, which lack the prior film’s thrills and panache. Only the big second act set piece manages to channel the energy that drove *Curse of the Black Pearl*, including enough wry jokes and swashbuckling fun to keep things light yet exciting. That’s a rare moment though, and even it gives way to the film’s “too much, too quickly” pacing problems eventually.

If that weren’t enough, the film is awash in callbacks to the first film, constantly elbowing the audience in the ribs and trying to see if it remembers the franchise’s earlier, better effort. There’s a *Star Wars* prequel level of embarrassingly on-the-nose references to the prior movie here, and at least there, the franchise went sixteen years between releases, rather than three, before it started eating its own tail.

The real problem is that the original *Pirates of the Caribbean* was built to be a breezy, exciting lark of a film, not a franchise-starter. So when Disney and Verbinski try to reverse engineer their way into a grand tale with enough mythos and high drama to turn *Pirates* into some epic quest, the effort looks like so many boats in these movies -- creaky, haphazardly built, and full of holes. Trying to force Jack Sparrow and his cohort into that mold leaves *Dead Man’s Chest* feeling like just another disappointing, overblown blockbuster, losing the spark and glimmer of the movie that accidentally started this series, like so much sunken treasure.
Like  -  Dislike  -  11
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by LorumIpsomLydia
3 years ago
@andrewbloom Absolutely nailing the flaws (pointless love triangle, attention deficit plot line, uncomfortable stereotypes) with this second film that left audiences leaving the box office underwhelmed and only mildly entertained 15years later. It's a means to getting to the final film in the trilogy.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  10

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Tygerboi
7/10  10 months ago
This second POTC adventure is, like its predecessor, full of action, humour and brilliant sets/locations and special effects. However, DMC has more concurrent individual character arcs/subplots, deception, backstabbing and allegiance-switching than you'd see in an entire season of "24", which can make things a little confusing at times. The result is an epic maelstrom of excellent CGI, beautiful locations, MacGuffins, Easter eggs, a possible homage to Return of the Jedi, and plenty of over-the-top antics (even by the standard he set in CoTBP) from Jack Sparrow - all culminating in an unsatisfying ending which was clearly just paving the way for the sequel. The saving graces that makes this film high quality and well worth watching are the excellent acting, the non-stop action and the light-hearted humour.

I kept thinking all throughout this film (more than any other POTC film) that Disney may have been raising a jug of rum (or maybe a mug of grog) to the 1990's graphic adventure games "The Secret of Monkey Island" and "LeChuck's Revenge: Monkey Island 2" from LucasArts (a franchise which Disney subsequently purchased) as there are many similarities:
1) A charming-but-foolish protagonist (Will Turner in DMC / Guybrush Threepwood in SoMI) who has recently become a pirate is chasing after the love of his life (Elizabeth Swan / Elaine Marley) who is herself a sassy, witty, piratey, stunner.
2) Turner-wood is trying to rescue Swan-Marley from the evil clutches of a mangy, dead pirate captain (Davy Jones / LeChuck).
3) Jones even looks a bit like the zombie pirate LeChuck - other than by being a mangy, dead pirate captain - in that his beard is tentacular and wriggly.
4) Jo-Chuck's ship is a spooky, fearsome vessel crewed by undead pirates.
5) There is a black voodoo lady with a strong Jamaican accent who gives cryptic advice on what to do.
6) Artefacts have to be collected to control/bring down the undead evil pirate Jo-Chuck.
7) Jack Sparrow's antics would easily be within the realm of those performed by Guybrush Threepwood, but GT has been divided into two characters in POTC - Will and Jack.
No doubt there are other such similarities between these two franchises which I have forgotten about/haven't discovered yet, as I have only completed the first two MI games, and half the third. I would heartily recommend playing them (remastered versions are available on Steam and GOG), if you haven't done so already.
Like  -  Dislike  -  00
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
ColdStream96
CONTAINS SPOILERS8/10  3 years ago
**THE GOOD: ‘PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: DEAD MAN’S CHEST’**

WRITING: 75
ACTING: 90
LOOK: 95
SOUND: 95
FEEL: 70
NOVELTY: 75
ENJOYMENT: 75
RE-WATCHABILITY: 65
INTRIGUE: 70
EXPECTATIONS: 60

----

**THE GOOD:**

Feeling bigger, bolder and at times funnier, Dead Man's Chest recreates what worked the first time and gives it a new spin to weave the first half of a bigger pirate epic. It doesn’t spare any expense in trying to feel like a true sequel while holding dearly to the characters and plot element that worked well in the first film.

Tom Hollander as new villain Lord Beckett is both annoyingly narrow-minded and conveniently vile. He brings a much-needed human antagonist into the mix and is one of the more successful villain castings I’ve seen.

Davy Jones is yet another memorable film villain, and while he is more monstrous than pirate-y, Bill Nighy makes him distinctively his own. The CGI used to make him come alive still hold up today.

I'm happy to see Keira Knightly receive a good dose of the action. Elizabeth is a strong female character, who is developed across the first three films better than any of the other central characters. Knightley portrays both the feminine and the masculine side of the character equally well.

This film is yet another successful mix of great practical effects, polished CGI and breathtaking stunt coordination. The fights feel bigger, the world feels more alive, and the attention to details remains sharp.

The three-way fight on Davy Jones’ island is probably the best action sequence of the series. It’s funny, it’s epic and it’s memorable even if it goes on and on seemingly without an end.

----

**THE BAD:**

The first half is a solid, fun and comedic pirate adventure in the vein of the first film, but once Davy Jones is introduced the film slowly starts to struggle under its weight, a problem that carries over to film three. The resulting film feels at times bloated and overlong since it has to juggle so many plotlines and characters and set up the third film. The inclusion of politics, pirate faiths and beliefs and the like suddenly makes this film a whole lot more serious.

There's no real sea battle in this one, which is a shame. They are usually the best parts in pirate movies.

It’s strange how pretty much all of the magic and classic fun from the first film has been stripped away from the sequel(s). That’s the main reason the rest of the franchise never lives up to the standards set by the first film.

----

**THE UGLY:**

Why haven’t Disney announced a Pintel and Ragetti-spinoff already?

----

**THE VERDICT:**

_Dead Man’s Chest feels bigger and bolder compared to the original Pirate-film, but also begins the franchise’s slow descent from a magical family adventure into a bloated pirate fantasy._

**77% = :white_check_mark: = GOOD**
Like  -  Dislike  -  0
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Andre Gonzales
/10  3 months ago
Part 2 introduces Davy Jones. Jack Sparrow has owed Davy a debt. Now Davy intends to make Jack make good on that debt. One way or another. Really awesome sequel.
Like  -  Dislike  -  0
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
CinemaSerf
/10  3 months ago
I usually think that a good spell of time between an original and a sequel is a good thing. It gives everyone space to refresh the ideas and develop the characterisations. That's pretty much what Gore Verbinsky has done with this superior follow-up to the 2003 story. This time, we don't really need to spend much time on the who's who bits, so can head straight to the action which for the next 2½ hours follows "Jack Sparrow" (Johnny Depp) double-dealing as only he can trying to stay one step ahead of the vengeful "Davy Jones" (Bill Nighy) with whom he made a deal that means it's now his turn to enter hell. Meantime, "Will" (Orlando Bloom) and "Elizabeth" (Keira Knightley) are having problems of their own, and when he has to try to kidnap "Jack" with his compass for the dastardly "Lord Beckett" (Tom Hollander) in return for her safety he, en route, becomes reunited with his rather curmudgeonly (and barnacled) father (Stellan Skarsgård). It seems that both "Will" and "Jack" cannot both get what they need - but can they find a solution? It's end-to-end stuff this, with loads of mythical creatures from the depths, a tiny bit of romance and a Johnny Depp very much at the top of his game. The story is solid and entertaining, as is much of the quickly paced dialogue and David Schofield turns in a good effort as the malevolent "Mercer". I could have done with Geoffrey Rush but otherwise this is a fun fantasy adventure with some cracking visual effects and Hans Zimmer's music adds richness to the jollity too. A big screen must, really. It's just not so good on the telly.
Like  -  Dislike  -  0
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top