Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Reviews for: Spring Breakers

genslen
1/10  6 years ago
Ever see a movie and you suddenly realize your IQ is dropping? That's this movie. I seriously cannot believe this movie got made, or that anyone in charge of the budget signed off on it. It's horribly dull, just scene after scene of people dancing and partying. These four "ladies" go on "spraang braaaake" and bad stuff happens. I kept waiting for the point, but really, the movie has nothing to say other than "look at these ladies in their bikinis." I guess the "moral" is that you shouldn't do bad things or bad things might happen to you? Maybe?

My least favorite part was the constant repetition of lines. I feel like the "writers" couldn't come up with good dialogue, so when they found something they liked, they repeated it. At one point, the girls get arrested, and they keep saying "it wasn't supposed to be like this" over and over. I'm not kidding, I think they said it six or seven times. The film is visually stunning, if I'm being positive. They spent a LOT of money on neon lights and fake guns...and swimsuits. SO MANY swimsuits, and so many closeups of women in swimsuits. I kinda feel like the director graduated from "Girls Gone Wild" to artsy films, but this need more plot, character arcs, and less of James Franco's teeth. If you want to hear people say "spraang braaaake forevvvvvahhh" many MANY times, go for it.
Like  -  Dislike  -  92
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by LucanReynolds
5 years ago
@genslen "writers couldn't comes up with good dialogue." lmao get the fuck out!
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by Thiz
5 years ago
I agree 100% with you. Loved the way you stated, about feeling my IQ dropping. Made me laugh out loud, but so true.<br /> I'm amazed it was made. And, mostly that I watched it entirely.<br /> Well, was kind of half watching halfway, while not paying full attention.<br /> Surprised this got into my watch list, I added it after seeing it recommended with good reviews HERE and Letterboxd.<br /> Guess I just didn't, or failed to get the goodness of the movie that sites, critics and etc, viewed and was considered a "must"<br /> For me, a must forget I saw it. Kinda already did
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
nigelj
CONTAINS SPOILERS1/10  11 years ago
There is only one redeeming factor about this movie, the fact that Trakt give rating of 1 heart the name 'Weak Sauce :(' as that describes this movie perfectly.

People may say that this is a more 'arty' film, let's be frank, it's not well enough executed to be one, I've seen better arty films elsewhere.

Not only that, but I just can't get over the plot holes, which includes some typical Hollywood style puffery, for instance, the girls hold up a cafe (I think) at gunpoint, steal money from the till without wearing gloves (so you'd think there are fingerprints at least), the girls later get arrested during Spring Break (so I'd imagine fingerprinted), so I'm either over-estimating police intelligence or information sharing, or that was a pretty big plot hole.

In addition, when they are outside the diner/superette(?) and they re-enact the hold up, how that scene would go completely unnoticed, boggles my mind, it just doesn't make sense to me.

Apart from what I feel like plot holes, the proportion of runtime spent on mindless dribble/fast cuts/etc (which is really the director trying to be artsy) bored me out of my mind like you'd never believe.

In summary, I want my hour and a half back!
Like  -  Dislike  -  32
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by daenerystargaryen
11 years ago
lol sorry, i have to rant for a minute. you're looking waaay to into this movie. the director, harmony korine, has said multiple times there is no plot in this movie. it's more like a liquid narrative where time is more free, it can jump forwards and backwards. it's supposed to mimic a drug experience in a way. it's more more musical and experimental than a traditional movie. i'm assuming you were expecting to see a generic spring break movie and were not open to something totally different. so now knowing this, you should go back and watch it and i guarantee you'll have a different opinion about it. okay bye.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  20

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by LucanReynolds
5 years ago
@nigelj Sorry but you are clearly not used to truly unique cinema if you are commenting on plot holes etc in fucking Spring Breakers. This is more an experience than a film, a trip.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Mark B
/10  4 years ago
This movie had such great potential. If it just followed the compelling short description of the movie, instead of making that short description nearly EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS IN THE MOVIE, it would be intriguing. This was the most tedious, redundant and gratuitous movie I've seen in a very long time. I expected the gratuitous ... it opened with an extended "Girls Gone Wild" sequence. But then it showed that sequence again, and again and again, then again, and again and again! This would be a "one-star" without James Franco. Once he is introduced you are captivated by his transformation into a wannabe gangsta rapper, especially given his tame, Disney-esque acting in "Oz, the Great and Powerful." But then the tedious redundancy corrupted even his performance. The cinematography is interesting but with little plot and the unrelenting repetitiveness, even that became another irritant. If they removed all of the redundant scenes I think the movie would have been 30 minutes long.
Like  -  Dislike  -  0
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top