Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Comments for: Star Trek Into Darkness

indianamulder says...
11 years ago
Brilliant continuation of the saga and a wonderful twist on a familiar story! Great acting from all involved especially Benedict Cumberbatch and Karl Urban!
Like  -  Dislike  -  700
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
MellowB says...
11 years ago
You know, I kinda liked the first movie in the reboot series while my friends that saw it in the cinema back then with me absolutely hated it. We were similar Star Trek fans and enjoyed the franchise up to that point equally as much I'd say. Yes, I liked the first one even tho it was a farcry from the older material and left the feeling that the writers and Abrams didn't really "get" the Star Trek universe and just kinda created yet another "new" action franchise.

But this? I'm almost disgusted by the pandering and ridiculous try at "fan-service" in this movie. The references, the "role-reversal", the whole copying of material and characters from older movies with "a twist" and what not. A shame. How about something original and not another silly revenge story THAT WE ALREADY KINDA HAD?
WHY create a alternate universe if we are going to re-tread old ground and that even badly?
The movie was a mess, I don't know what the writers were thinking, not even gonna mention Abrams, can we just not give him movies or tv shows in the future please? (and that ship crashing into Alcatraz... what was he trying to tell us there?! good lord...)

As a Star Trek fan I feel insulted after watching this and if they are not going to come up with something new and original for the next movie this certainly was the last one I watched in this alternate timeline and will just start to pretend that it never existed.
Like  -  Dislike  -  601
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by -puma-
11 years ago
You have to remember that this is an alternate universe. So the possibility that some events happen again or slightly different is not impossible ^^<br /> I think it makes perfectly sense.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  10

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
whl says...
CONTAINS SPOILERS
11 years ago
The presence of khan felt forced. And it added nothing to the story. Everything khan should have been left out.
Like  -  Dislike  -  501
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by morphinapg
2 years ago
@whl Why? Cumberbatch was brilliant in the role and I think it made for a great story. So what if it's sort of a reimagining of a familiar story? There's nothing wrong with that, especially when we're talking about alternate timelines.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
FinFan says...
CONTAINS SPOILERS
7 years ago
Forgive me but I have to do it. The thing that is fundamentaly wrong with Abrams` Trek is it´s all about > being cool. Everything in the movies has to stand up to this mantra. [spoiler] Is it cool to hide a Starship inside an ocean on a planet ? Yes. Is it Star Trek. No, it´s not [/spoiler] Newsflash Mr. Abrams: Star Trek has made billions of fans all over the world for half a century without being cool. It doesn´t need to be. It´s not Marvel.
Furthermore, they create a new timeline so that they can do something new but all they are really doing is leeching of ideas from the original and simply twisting the plots in them around. That is not my idea of doing something new.
Again way to much lens flare (its JJ Abrams). Again great CGI (It´s ILM).
If it wouldn´t be calling itself a Star Trek movie I actually would give it a higher rating. But I can´t. It is better then the first but only slightly. I can´t see past the fact what they did (are doing) to the characters. This is in essence Star Trek for the Marvel generation.
Like  -  Dislike  -  201
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by morphinapg
2 years ago
@finfan Lol what the heck is wrong with Star Trek looking cool? I think the movie feels authentic to the world and characters of Star Trek while ALSO being a fun, cool looking movie. It can be both. Alternate timelines adapting familiar stories with some changes just makes sense, and I think it's absolutely ridiculous how much people criticize this movie for it. Just because the story feels familiar doesn't mean it's bad.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
spiff24x says...
11 years ago
HavlKedelig scifi film
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
bevigilant says...
CONTAINS SPOILERS
11 years ago
Star trek for RTARDS. For a startrek film 3/10

For an action film 7/10. It seemed to be one over the top action sequence to the next.

I knew I was in for a bad ride when the enterprise was parked hidden in the ocean. Why was it not in orbit?
Like  -  Dislike  -  201
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by ketu
11 years ago
Because Starships also want to chill out sometimes. hehe
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Whitsbrain says...
2 years ago
It's not the idealistic, brainy, Star Trek that we grew up with. This is a fast moving action flick made for the Summer movie season. Just like J.J. Abrams's debut attempt at recreating the "Star Trek" world a few years ago, "Star Trek Into Darkness" provides all of the characters that we grew up with but gives each their own distinct moment. Some of the moments actually seem very out of character, but the whole movie is very entertaining.

To enjoy this you have got to leave the legacy of Star Trek at the ticket booth. This cannot be a continuation of the original Star Trek series or for that matter, the original movies. It's a new Trek for a new audience. Sit back and enjoy this for what it is, which is a lot of fun.
Like  -  Dislike  -  100
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
KurtMoney says...
8 years ago
Rewatched this for Beyond. Better than people think. Gets a bad rep for some reason.
Like  -  Dislike  -  100
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Mr. Sackamano says...
6 years ago
Ppphhhffrrrrttt o.g. Khan had sweeter pecs
Like  -  Dislike  -  100
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
ryburke says...
8 years ago
This is worst ST movie! Plot does not work, characters are flat and juvenile and the whole thing is just a no go. I couldn't even watch the whole movie because the plot had too many holes in it. This was as bad as the ST one movie where they remade "Vegar" ST episode and that was bad! Try again! #ShiftvW8
Like  -  Dislike  -  100
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
hardwarehank says...
10 years ago
Not too good. Better to just go back and watch Wrath of Khan again.
Like  -  Dislike  -  100
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top