Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Comments for: Suspiria

nmahoney416 says...
6 years ago
The cinematography is great and dancing all looked fantastic. The score was amazing. The editing and sound design were great. It does a good job of creeping you out. A slow burn until the bat shit crazy third act. I need to see it again to even try and begin to understand what happened but I think I loved it.
Like  -  Dislike  -  2005
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by akira429
5 years ago
@nmahoney416 the most pretentious review I've seen so far. You give a run for Amazon reviews. The profile picture of Jeff Daniels just screams REDDIT. I bet you think Tarantino is a genius too when he's a fucking hack that rips off foreign films people don't watch. Suspiria is meh, it's ok and only fun to watch to see the girls dancing and the final act. The fact you have to watch it twice to understand it is pathetic. It's cultism to the fucking core and tried way to hard to be a modern cult hit. We need more original films and concepts and need to stop fucking creaming over remake after remake. Fuck! Lol and fuck Reddit too.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by nmahoney416
5 years ago
@akira429 thanks for your comment.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by gunsgirl
5 years ago
@nmahoney416 your review makes me want to watch it tonight!
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by nmahoney416
5 years ago
@gunsgirl do it you won't regret it.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by gunsgirl
5 years ago
@nmahoney416 ok.... decision made! Thanks!
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
KurtMoney says...
6 years ago
I really gotta eat my words on this one. I talked so much shit about how it was gonna be terrible. On and on I went, with reason after reason. "The runtime!" "The color palette!" "The lead actress!" Blah blah blah. Stellar. I was so tense for so much of this thing. Absolutely amazing!!!!
Like  -  Dislike  -  1700
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
coffee_in_an_iv says...
6 years ago
The forgettable younger sister of _Black Swan_. A bland Dakota Johnson, Tilda Swinton playing type, and one good performance by Mia Goth. The score and the choreography are more than solid, the cinematography is alright. The rest of the film is not even worth talking about: trash.
Like  -  Dislike  -  1401
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by blazer380
5 years ago
@coffee_in_an_iv My thoughts exactly! It could have been so much better.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  10

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
caglayan1 says...
6 years ago
completely hated it, too long and unnecessary.
Like  -  Dislike  -  700
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
ana_hugz says...
CONTAINS SPOILERS
5 years ago
Too much buzz for a movie about a girl having [spoiler]her first period[/spoiler].
Like  -  Dislike  -  401
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by missgrey
5 years ago
@ana_hugz lmfao too funny ha ha ha
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Cb Uppercut says...
5 years ago
I'm not sure about this one, the cinematography is great, the score is really good, the dancing is all good but this movie is very long, it does kinda drag and im still not sure what I watched and not sure if I wanna find out.
Like  -  Dislike  -  300
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Jordyep says...
one year ago
Not entirely on board with this. The kills are definitely fun and creative, and it has a great climax. It’s pretty well shot, but there are a few times where the camerawork and editing can be awkward. For example, the occasional use of slowmotion, zooms and quick pans makes it look like they’re trying to emulate the style and feel of the ‘70s, which doesn’t fit with the rest of the film (not to mention that the execution isn’t great). Tilda Swinton gives a great performance, everyone else is fine. The problem is that fine isn’t good enough for this film, because most of the characters are underwritten, and combined with the fine performances I didn’t care that much emotionally. The score by Thom Yorke is very good, it has a good sense of atmosphere, but I do feel it dicks around a little too much. It didn’t need to be this long.

5.5/10
Like  -  Dislike  -  300
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
samucael says...
5 years ago
I enjoyed this movie. It keeps a lot of distance from the original Suspiria and that's good. I loved the cinematography and all that 70s aesthetics. The score is perfect, but I think the movie loses point on account of some poor acting and a troublesome plot at times.
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
faithful soul says...
5 years ago
There are two reasons why I never went to dance school. Firstly, I have the physical dexterity of a cow with two left feet. Secondly, I was put off by the witchery goings on at the dance school in the original movie; not exactly a good advert for movement academia!

But onto the movie itself after my tedius preamble. It isn't perfect; like the original, there is more style over substance. It's overlong by about half an hour too! However, it is very well made, there is imagination to spare, and the film shows more intelligence than many horror movies today. A rewatch might be in order as there is a lot to take in within one sitting. Patience is required, but it will be rewarded.
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
jekyl6669 says...
5 years ago
Truly an interesting witch movie. But this is no Suspiria... I wonder why they even bothered calling it that, aside from the obvious cashing in on the brand... It has a great aesthetic and doesn't drag as much as you would think with its bloated runtime. It's an interesting horror movie, I just wish it weren't saddled with its title.
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
pigfaced says...
CONTAINS SPOILERS
5 years ago
The Gorgeousness of 70's filmmaking is on full show.
The dance scenes are cut to a perfect Hypnotic rhythm.
It's a long run time, about an hr to build up what's happening in the coven, it's what it needs to be, but those 150mins of senses' bashing go by quickly.

Disappointed by the lack of 'torn apart' gore that had been mentioned in early reviews. There's barely any gore- until the end. and it's nothing particularly special.

Great music, performances, make-up, aesthetics.
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
PaulVincent83 says...
4 years ago
Completely absolutely hated this movie. I dont have any idea what was going on half the time. I get they are witches, but beyond that like what the actual fuck is going on here? I'd rather watch grass grow then see this again for any clarification either. And the fact it was so long too. If vomit came in movie form, Suspiria is what I'd find at the bottom of the toilet.
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
The_Argentinian says...
2 years ago
If you watch it expecting a typical modern Hollywood horror movie, you'll be disappointed. This is arthouse horror.
Also, people get mad when a remake is the same as the original and they get mad when it's different from the original. You can't never win.
Like  -  Dislike  -  200
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top