Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Reviews for: The Big Short

AndrewBloom
8/10  8 years ago
When I wrote my thoughts on Spotlight, I speculated about how knowing the end of the story going in, knowing the extent of the scandal the team in Spotlight was uncovering, may have robbed the plot of some of its punch. And yet, The Big Short is, in many ways, the perfect counter to that.

Almost everyone old enough to watch this film lived through The Great Recession. They know that the disaster all the main characters in the film are predicting comes true, in all its horrible, self-destructive glory. But rather than taking away from the film, it adds to it. There's this sense of foreboding, of doom that hangs over everything.

A film about the financial crisis, especially involving traders and analysts and people crunching numbers in a fund, could easily be too dry. And yet, the fact that the individuals the film focuses on are slowly but surely investigating an economic massacre waiting to happen, and how each step they take reveals another way that disaster might have been diverted, or people who are supposedly in the know digging the whole deeper, means that the entire film is just an exercise in creating that sinking feeling in the pit of your stomach. It's not a prestige picture; it's a horror film.

It's also a very weird film. It's not so bold in its presentation that it feels unprecedented, but it feels stitched together, disjointed, and unusual, but in a good way. Adam McKay, of Anchorman fame, is the right man for the job. There is a darkly funny absurdity to the topic The Big Short covers, and with his fourth-wall breaking asides, his cuts to celebrity explanations of complex financial consequences in ridiculous situations, and his jumping between various characters acting wild or nutty lends the perfect tone to the movie, one of simultaneous horror at what hell hath been wrought and unavoidable bemusement at the clowns who steered us all into this ditch.

The direction and rhythm of the film is frenetic. It's closest comparison point is Requiem For a Dream with the same frenetic hodgepodge of images and sounds, bleeding and blending into one another, disorienting the viewer and conveying the sense in which the financial world the film depicts is intoxicating, dizzying, and unsettled all at the same time.

Another aspect of the film that makes it hard to compare to other works in this space is the fact that it doesn't really have a protagonist or a plot. Sure, it has a story, and it has characters who take up the most oxygen over the course of the movie, but more than anything it feels like a documentary. It's far too stylized and irreverent to really deserve that label, but it's far more interested in trying to describe what happened, to explain just what mistakes and lies and blindspots led to the global economic crisis, than it is in rising action and resolution, or showing people growing or changing.

That's not to say there isn't an emotional element to the film. Steve Carell stands out by playing essentially a smarter, angrier Michael Scott who grabs your attention every time he's on screen. The parallels between his character's sense that a catastrophe is looming in economic terms that he could do something to prevent, and his guilt over not doing more to prevent his brother's suicide was--while perhaps a little easy--also affecting.

The rest of the cast do their jobs well, but blend together a bit because again, while they're a vital part of the film, the film isn't really about them. The characters in The Big Short are conduits to detail, in amusing and human terms, just what the hell went wrong. Christian Bale is a collection of actorly tics, but he acquits himself well enough. Ryan Gosling does his best dudebro douchebag type, and is sufficiently entertaining in that guise. And Brad Pitt seems pretty reserved, short of his moment where he chastises his young wards for being too happy about what they're making their money from.

But again, the fact that there's not really a narrative means that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. The film is not really a story; it's an autopsy, cutting up the corpse of our financial system and exposing the bloody innards, the rotten organs at the core that led the USA, and the world, to the dire economic state it was in by late 2008. In that sense, the film succeeds wildly, and McKay manages to tackle something of real significance without losing the absurd madcap attitude he brings to his comedic works, and somehow, doing justice to the insanity of the lead up to The Great Recession in the process. It's a hell of an achievement to make a film this funny, this disturbing, and this great.
Like  -  Dislike  -  302
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by MajorMercyFlush
8 years ago
"Christian Bale is a collection of actorly tics, but he acquits himself well enough" to be nominated for the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor. Bale was excellent here and totally nails the high functioning ASD 'tics' of Michael Burry. <br /> <br /> I disagree that there is no narrative, it's extremely well structured and handled by Ryan Gosling's character as the self described Narrator.<br /> <br /> I also didn't find it disjointed at all, nor 'characters acting wild or nutty' or madcap direction from McKay. Yes it is humorous but very controlled.<br /> <br /> I completely agree that it is an excellent film and truly worthy of the Best Picture, Best Director, Best Supporting Actor, Best Editing and Best Adapted Screenplay Oscar noms this year.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by AndrewBloom
8 years ago
Different strokes for different folks. I liked Christian Bale's performance well enough, but it struck me as labored rather than natural. Maybe it's just the number of films I've seen Bale in, but when I watched his character I saw "Christian Bale putting on a performance" rather than "Michael Burry". <br /> <br /> And perhaps saying there's no narrative is an overstatement, but there's no traditional narrative. The film shares the structure of films from Richard Linklater like Fast Food Nation, where there are a collection of smaller stories, but they're in service of exploring the implications of some important aspect of American society or culture rather than some overarching plot.<br /> <br /> And I meant disjointed, madcap, and wild in a complimentary way. From Gosling's character's preening, to the cocky real estate guys in Florida, to guys in suits interrupting Burry's rocking out to heavy metal, there's an absurdity to this whole thing, and it's a tone appropriate to the absurdity of the financial crisis. I think the direction and editing of the film, jumping from story to story with quick cuts and interspersed images, helps convey how bewildering and disorienting and interconnected this whole collapse is.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
mansemat
/10  6 years ago
Almost the whole time I was watching this movie (including the bath-scene with Margot Robbie) I felt like the biggest idiot on the planet.
I'm not a numbers guy nor do I know all the terminology in American banking and mortgage systems and most of it looked like watching some kind of alien language. In the end though I knew what happened, I saw people warning us for what was about to happen and watched it all crumble down when it did happen.

All in all though it's an excellent portrayal of a system that is quite frankly a big con, stripping away money from those "below" with people at the help that don't really know what they are doing. An intricate web of rules, regulations, lingo, faces and characters who don't know the full picture. I think the movie quite nicely mimicks this chaos in the way it is set up, the catchy camera movements and often loud and noisy environments the scenes play out in. Here's a famous face that will teach you plebs what it's about, "let's simplify this for ya" so you're lured in.

Despite it's dry subject, the vast amout of stuff I personally didn't fully grasp it is a very enjoyable movie that will keep you hooked till the end.

Oh and it took me about at third the movie to realize Brad Pitt was that one guy.
Like  -  Dislike  -  50
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
KevinSocial9697
9/10  4 years ago
There is a reason this film is my most-watched film and why I love it so much, the truth is that this film takes a very complicated event and finds a way to explain it to your average film watcher in such a way that makes you feel the impact of this event at the time and at the same time has those moments that make you laugh hard. That is because of the masterful direction from Adam McKay who is better known for comedy but this film shows that he is able to do both at an Oscar level.

I cannot pick out a favourite performance in this film as every single character is played so damn perfectly, the only actor who stands out the most to me is Steve Carell (Mark Baum) as he is playing a character who is suffering from trauma and at the same time trying to get ahead of the financial disaster of the entire century.

If you are interested in finding out about the financial crash in the 2000s, then I seriously recommend watching this film as it is extremely accurate and the weird thing with this film is that it is really rewatchable.
Like  -  Dislike  -  20
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
dgw
7/10  7 years ago
I refuse to believe that the bean counters at Scion Capital would let IT set all their computer workstations to "never sleep" the display. Think of all the electric bill inflation!

What's really great about all the Dell workstations scattered through the film is that I have either used or currently own nearly all of the peripherals shown on screen. (That probably just reveals how dated some of my hardware is, to be honest…)

Now, with that out of the way… I liked the tone of this documedy (if that wasn't a word yet, it is now). The mix of comedy and obvious dramatization (even pointing out the fictitious bits at points), the tongue-in-cheek hiring of celebrities to explain the "dry" bits—all of it…except the music. On several occasions, the choice of music just didn't make any sense. I get that the film was going for loud, in-your-face, even obnoxious, but it just didn't work sometimes. It felt like trying to force a laugh at the juxtaposition of music with scene, and seemed half-baked.

The characters didn't really stand out much from each other. With the exception of Mark Baum, all of the bankers were interchangeable more-or-less white guys, both in appearance and in personality. Ben Rickert was more of a caricature than a character, hardly possessed of any depth. Not that I expected depth in a movie of this sort…but it's still disappointing. It's 100% possible to have both deep characters and good comedy, but _The Big Short_ delivered (mostly) flat characters and (generally) passable comedy.

7.3 seems about right, since I did laugh a solid few times and learned some stuff. (7.4 if I were feeling generous, but I'm not.)
Like  -  Dislike  -  20
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
izgzhen
/10  6 years ago
Perfect film as I see. The actors are all awesome and characteristic. The rhythm is tight and deeply involving.

I really like the theme -- 2008 global economy crisis. This film explains many technical sides unfamiliar to most of us, including those deeply affected by this catastrophe. Above the technical details, the main four roles have different philosophical insights during this event:

Michael Burry -- Realistic, Objective, Knowing history

Ben Rickert & Pals -- Murphy's Law

Jared Vennett -- Distrust of the Big Corp

Mark Baum -- Belief in the justice, even in against of the money

In conclusion, 100% recommended.
Like  -  Dislike  -  0
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top