Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Reviews for: The Big Short

AndrewBloom
8/10  8 years ago
When I wrote my thoughts on Spotlight, I speculated about how knowing the end of the story going in, knowing the extent of the scandal the team in Spotlight was uncovering, may have robbed the plot of some of its punch. And yet, The Big Short is, in many ways, the perfect counter to that.

Almost everyone old enough to watch this film lived through The Great Recession. They know that the disaster all the main characters in the film are predicting comes true, in all its horrible, self-destructive glory. But rather than taking away from the film, it adds to it. There's this sense of foreboding, of doom that hangs over everything.

A film about the financial crisis, especially involving traders and analysts and people crunching numbers in a fund, could easily be too dry. And yet, the fact that the individuals the film focuses on are slowly but surely investigating an economic massacre waiting to happen, and how each step they take reveals another way that disaster might have been diverted, or people who are supposedly in the know digging the whole deeper, means that the entire film is just an exercise in creating that sinking feeling in the pit of your stomach. It's not a prestige picture; it's a horror film.

It's also a very weird film. It's not so bold in its presentation that it feels unprecedented, but it feels stitched together, disjointed, and unusual, but in a good way. Adam McKay, of Anchorman fame, is the right man for the job. There is a darkly funny absurdity to the topic The Big Short covers, and with his fourth-wall breaking asides, his cuts to celebrity explanations of complex financial consequences in ridiculous situations, and his jumping between various characters acting wild or nutty lends the perfect tone to the movie, one of simultaneous horror at what hell hath been wrought and unavoidable bemusement at the clowns who steered us all into this ditch.

The direction and rhythm of the film is frenetic. It's closest comparison point is Requiem For a Dream with the same frenetic hodgepodge of images and sounds, bleeding and blending into one another, disorienting the viewer and conveying the sense in which the financial world the film depicts is intoxicating, dizzying, and unsettled all at the same time.

Another aspect of the film that makes it hard to compare to other works in this space is the fact that it doesn't really have a protagonist or a plot. Sure, it has a story, and it has characters who take up the most oxygen over the course of the movie, but more than anything it feels like a documentary. It's far too stylized and irreverent to really deserve that label, but it's far more interested in trying to describe what happened, to explain just what mistakes and lies and blindspots led to the global economic crisis, than it is in rising action and resolution, or showing people growing or changing.

That's not to say there isn't an emotional element to the film. Steve Carell stands out by playing essentially a smarter, angrier Michael Scott who grabs your attention every time he's on screen. The parallels between his character's sense that a catastrophe is looming in economic terms that he could do something to prevent, and his guilt over not doing more to prevent his brother's suicide was--while perhaps a little easy--also affecting.

The rest of the cast do their jobs well, but blend together a bit because again, while they're a vital part of the film, the film isn't really about them. The characters in The Big Short are conduits to detail, in amusing and human terms, just what the hell went wrong. Christian Bale is a collection of actorly tics, but he acquits himself well enough. Ryan Gosling does his best dudebro douchebag type, and is sufficiently entertaining in that guise. And Brad Pitt seems pretty reserved, short of his moment where he chastises his young wards for being too happy about what they're making their money from.

But again, the fact that there's not really a narrative means that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. The film is not really a story; it's an autopsy, cutting up the corpse of our financial system and exposing the bloody innards, the rotten organs at the core that led the USA, and the world, to the dire economic state it was in by late 2008. In that sense, the film succeeds wildly, and McKay manages to tackle something of real significance without losing the absurd madcap attitude he brings to his comedic works, and somehow, doing justice to the insanity of the lead up to The Great Recession in the process. It's a hell of an achievement to make a film this funny, this disturbing, and this great.
Like  -  Dislike  -  302
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by MajorMercyFlush
8 years ago
"Christian Bale is a collection of actorly tics, but he acquits himself well enough" to be nominated for the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor. Bale was excellent here and totally nails the high functioning ASD 'tics' of Michael Burry. <br /> <br /> I disagree that there is no narrative, it's extremely well structured and handled by Ryan Gosling's character as the self described Narrator.<br /> <br /> I also didn't find it disjointed at all, nor 'characters acting wild or nutty' or madcap direction from McKay. Yes it is humorous but very controlled.<br /> <br /> I completely agree that it is an excellent film and truly worthy of the Best Picture, Best Director, Best Supporting Actor, Best Editing and Best Adapted Screenplay Oscar noms this year.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by AndrewBloom
8 years ago
Different strokes for different folks. I liked Christian Bale's performance well enough, but it struck me as labored rather than natural. Maybe it's just the number of films I've seen Bale in, but when I watched his character I saw "Christian Bale putting on a performance" rather than "Michael Burry". <br /> <br /> And perhaps saying there's no narrative is an overstatement, but there's no traditional narrative. The film shares the structure of films from Richard Linklater like Fast Food Nation, where there are a collection of smaller stories, but they're in service of exploring the implications of some important aspect of American society or culture rather than some overarching plot.<br /> <br /> And I meant disjointed, madcap, and wild in a complimentary way. From Gosling's character's preening, to the cocky real estate guys in Florida, to guys in suits interrupting Burry's rocking out to heavy metal, there's an absurdity to this whole thing, and it's a tone appropriate to the absurdity of the financial crisis. I think the direction and editing of the film, jumping from story to story with quick cuts and interspersed images, helps convey how bewildering and disorienting and interconnected this whole collapse is.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top