Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Reviews for: The Blind Side

AdamMorgan
CONTAINS SPOILERS4/10  6 years ago
Before I begin, I need to get one thing straight. I watch movies because I like to see good films. I do not watch movies to kill time or feel good or to "not think for a while" as so many people say. It doesn't mean that I mind when a movie is inspirational as long as it is intelligent and gives me something to think about. The backdrops will change but quality should remain. This does not mean that I expect anyone else to watch a movie the way I do - I just want you to know where I'm coming from.

The more I think about it, the more I hate this movie.

The film is based on a real-life event where a rich southern family took in a semi-homeless black teenager. That part (and maybe only that part) is actually true. In itself, that story is amazing and incredibly touching. Too often in life we all look the other way when we see something uncomfortable on the streets.

It is this core story that is what is heartwarming. If I gave you the synopsis in one or two minutes you would be touched and your heart would be warmed. You're a better person for hearing about it. But there is a huge difference between relating the story and what was done in this movie and that is where my problem is. Just about everything that happened in the movie was contrived and superficial and meant to pull at your heartstrings.

And I know what you're saying - so what? It is a movie. If this were a novel or something like that, great. I can tolerate and even partially enjoy a movie like Serendipity that is meant to be pure sugar and meant to make you feel good. This movie had a touching core. The saccharin that was poured on top of it was at best unnecessary.

You want uplifting? Go see Precious. Now there was a film that was gritty, awful, beautiful and uplifting. It didn't need to cue the sappy music to let you know a scene was coming. The story stood on its own.


Anyway, here are the reasons why this movie was so bad.
[spoiler]
The majority of the events never happened. Sandra Bullock didn't call the coach on the field during a game or run onto the field during practice to save the day. They didn't pick up the boy while he was walking along the street on a rainy night. There wasn't a dramatic moment where the coach fought to get the boy into school. All these dramatic scenes were standard Hollywood formulas for contrived emotions.[/spoiler]
[spoiler]
There was a single character in the move and that was the mother (Bullock). Every other character in the movie was either a prop (the boy) or a doormat (the husband, coach, etc). Worse, they all are expected to crown her as some queen while she insults them and ponders if this makes her a great person or not. Why? I think the answer is simple - it was meant to be a vehicle for Bullock and it was to be her show (even though, by all accounts, the real-life husband was very responsible for what happened).[/spoiler]
[spoiler]
Why are people so impressed with the sassy women? They should have called this movie "Erin Brockovich 2". I don't know what was more cringe-worthy: the scene where she drives into the hood and threatens some thugs with violence or where she verbally assaults the father in the stands at the game. If you met this woman in real life you'd want her dead. Can you imagine if someone called your kid's coach during a game to give advice (or worse, walking into a practice and treating the players like infants)? Would you talk down to him or your husband the way she repeatedly did? But for some reason people see it on screen and like it.[/spoiler]
[spoiler]
Speaking of condescending, what about her treatment towards the boy? He was essentially a pet in this movie. She ordered him to go here, there and everywhere. The big "trick" was teaching him how to play football. Think about it - he didn't have a meaningful line until the last 5 minutes of the movie and he was on screen more than anyone. I want to know what he thinks about the culture shock that he's been through. Was it difficult for him to move in with this family? What does he think of his past? We hear none of this because it is written to be a coronation of the mother.[/spoiler]
[spoiler]
I can see why black Americans were a little upset by this movie. Once again, don't get me wrong - it is admirable that they did what they did. But a bored and rich housewife takes on a project and they make a movie about it? There are scores of grandmothers that raised their grandkids because the parents weren't around - I can't imagine being one of those people and seeing this movie (and I can't imagine Hollywood making that movie). Also, the popularity of this film is more proof of the way we look at black Americans. We think that we need to protect them and be parents to them - you see it everyday in speech, movies, tv, etc. That is the real racism in this country.[/spoiler]
[spoiler]
Why the constant need to remind us that they are Christians and conservative? Besides, the message was hypocritical. Was it Christian to have academic standards to the Christian school? Was it Christian to live in that huge mansion? I think not.
Cliched. The whole movie was one cliche after another! You could see the next scene coming at every step of the way. Once again, this takes away from what the movie should have been about.
[/spoiler]

So, there you have it. If you like cheesy books written by the likes of Mitch Albom (other than "Morrie") or Glen Beck, you probably liked this. And I get that. But lets not pretend that it was anything more than a sunday night movie that you'd see on ABC (do they still have those?). Worse, lets not pretend that Bullock should have won the award. It is a crime that the leads in Inglorious Basterds or Precious didn't get it. Hell, I'd toss in the woman from Up in the Air also.

follow me at https://IHATEBadMovies.com (like this one)
Like  -  Dislike  -  61
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by lutherthanos
4 years ago
@adammorgan <br /> Is it that bad? I usually don't write but I don't think it was that bad (4/10). <br /> It says based on a true story so you have to wait for only some of the events to be true, I understand that most of them aren't. (better watch a documentary or google to learn about the real story).<br /> <br /> [spoiler]For "the scene where she drives into the hood and threatens some thugs with violence" and "Can you imagine if someone called your kid's coach during a game to give advice" +more I think you can excuse these (far from reality) scenes cause its a movie, some people like them some don't and I think we need to focus more on the act of the family which they saw someone (a kid) who needs help and refuse to not do something, (far from reality, meaning you don't see that often) as you said, "Too often in life we all look the other way when we see something uncomfortable on the streets." they didn't just help Michael they make him family with he's will. and of course, he changes their lives in a good(very good) way.<br /> I don't see why you see Michael as a pet, she knew that he didn't want to speak for his past and his feelings until he was comfortable to do it, she gave him time and I think you can clearly see that she saw him as a son.(not only she but all of them saw him as a family). most parents always trying to do what they think! is best for their kids but most of the time isn't.<br /> you said a bored and rich housewife takes on a project and they make a movie about it. the movie makes me understand that it wasn't a project but if It was a project I don't think it matters that much cause it might start as a project but very soon it changed in something really good and far away from a 'project'. in the end, good things happened to all of them, and that matter most. You can see his friend died in the hood and that's happening all the time around the world but maybe! without any help that could be big mike.<br /> about the part "grandmothers that raised their grandkids because the parents weren't around " they did what's right like this family same thing but is different sadly I think because most people see it different they don't see a biological with a non-biological kid as the same, they don't treat them the same, they can't easily bond with them or think they can't bond with them at all.<br /> about that part "Also, the popularity of this film is more proof of the way we look at black Americans. We think that we need to protect them and be parents to them" racism is real but I don't think it goes here, its best to try to help maybe protect and be a parent to the people that actually need help, nothing bad with that. that's not the real racism. we just add racism in this case. with that logic, if we must not think that way a white family would see a kid in cold weather with a t-shirt and say he is black he doesn't need our help. and if we think that way we are racists.[/spoiler]
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
mooney240
/10  one year ago
**The Blind Side surprises with a heartfelt emotional, meaningful story that stands out even further with Sandra Bullock’s poignant performance.**

Inspirational and moving. The Blind Side is a story spotlighting the power of kindness and compassion. Sandra Bullock stands out with an Oscar-winning portrayal of Leigh Anne Tuohy, filling her with all the charm and grit of a strong Southern woman with the sympathy and tenacity to give a talented and caring young man the help he needed to change his life and circumstances. I felt the urge to hug my family and tell them how precious they are and how lucky I am to be theirs. This movie just gives you those feels! The Blind Side’s stirring story is powerful, potent, and compelling. While the emphasis of this movie might not be football, the focus on character in the face of judgment and difficulty makes The Blind Side an outstanding sports film.
Like  -  Dislike  -  0
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
bizzort
7/10  5 years ago
I find it very difficult to judge this film. I like the story as a whole, without thinking too much about it, but as soon as I give it some thought I think it all falls apart. I'm not sure why this is Sandra Bullock's movie when it should be a story about Oher. I'd like to find out more about Oher's struggles to fit into a brand new environment rather than Bullock's character doing the bare minimum in saying "Shame on you" to all of these soft racists in a redneck area. This shows that the film probably doesn't appeal to black audiences at all, which is a shame because there's a lot of potential with some of its secondary messages.

I'd say this is a cliche story but only from the writing aspect. Every overused non-romantic trope is present. Overall, I don't know how much of this story is actually true and what is a stretch but I did enjoy it on some level, coming from a meager background myself. However, I can't rate it, and I can't truly tell you if I like the film or not. I think it's too simplistic, but I also think it's just as oversimplified to label it purely a white guilt film, rate it a 1 and walk away. There's a reason why this film was so popular, obvious warts showing and all, and that's more interesting than the movie itself.
Like  -  Dislike  -  0
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top