Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Comments for: The Man Who Killed Don Quixote

353sqmijy says...
7 years ago
The director and the producer should be arrested. In order to shoot the film, they destroyed part of the monument that is Unesco's patrimony.

They broke ancient stones, cut trees without permission to make fires with twenty meters ...

It was a total disrespect, destroy world heritage just for the purpose of making money ....

I recommend everyone, do a search on Google or translate Portuguese news on the subject.
Like  -  Dislike  -  405
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by JMrBrown
6 years ago
@_diogogomes Following update on the accusations: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/portugal-rejects-claim-terry-gilliams-don-quixote-shoot-harmed-convent-1018501<br /> <br /> tl:dr They were judged wrong.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  30

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by Zythean
6 years ago
@_diogogomes Ukbar Filmes, the Portuguese production company used at the location shooting, acknowledged that there was some damage, which was catalogued by the convent officials who monitored the filming. <br /> <br /> The damage included six modern roof tiles and four small chips in masonry, which will be restored, as stated by Ukbar Filmes to the Associated Press. However, the trees were planted during the making of another film and officials consented to their removal at the end of the shoot.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by 353sqmijy
6 years ago
@zythean This not give the right to broke ancient stones and replace for new ones without the history and the memories of the people that interacted with the stones through the centuries.<br /> <br /> Sorry but the replacement doesn't make any sense to me.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  10

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by 353sqmijy
6 years ago
@jmrbrown They're lying. If they didn't damage why the replacement.<br /> <br /> For everyone that do not believe, come to Portugal and see with your own eyes.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  10

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by Silrog
4 years ago
@353sqmijy From wiki: On 4 July 2017, Portuguese authorities ruled that Gilliam's crew was only responsible for "insignificant damage", adding that the accusations "lacked rigor and revealed a lack of scientific knowledge".
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
deplorableme says...
5 years ago
What Did I just watch?? Did I take LSD without knowing??
Like  -  Dislike  -  300
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
stevenst1892 says...
6 years ago
'The Man who killed Don Quixote' has some great designs and props, as well as strong acting.

However, this movie could have been so much more. It sadly lacks in essential components on a film about Don Quixote - particularly storywise with the book being a masterpiece of storytelling and in a way the first modern novel.

It's a difficult work to stand up to or the name of which to slap on one's own work without facing duties of extremely rigorous writing, which should remain as Cervantes's: clever but simple, with several layers of study for those who would want to look further. Gilliam's story is simply here too confused and confusing. It is difficult to discern which idea or even which message he wanted to convey.

Some films should perhaps sometimes remain utopies in their creator's minds, as only there can they forever be perfect.

If you are looking for a great film about Don Quixote and that still involves Terry Gilliam, watch the documentary 'Lost in La Mancha'. It is a superb testament to what Gilliam had in mind 25 years ago.



Like  -  Dislike  -  300
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
dianacaldeiraguerra says...
5 months ago
So, so bad. Not worth watching.
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
mbody says...
3 years ago
This movie honestly makes no sense at all. You can barely tell what's real and what's not and it's so random and all over the place. I get the concept of a modern man believing he's Don Quijote. That's an interesting concept but the movie just jumped around randomly and everyone was honestly completely insane.
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
VWFringe says...
2 years ago
So meaningful this got crossed off his bucket list. And, I found the slow descent into madness -- or, finding his true calling -- or, accepting the mantle passed to _him_ by his _heir_, to be especially rewarding! (Better than a career making commercials...though I wasn't even clear until deciphering the credits that that was what was being filmed at the beginning!)

I wouldn't even have known if I hadn't accidentally watched Graham Chapman's posthumously written (?) autobiographic film, "A Liar's Autobiography."
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
psonnosp says...
one year ago
Sadly not worth the wait.
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
faithful soul says...
4 years ago
25 years in the making and yet...we get a great big lumbering mess of a movie. The film might have been better in one of its earlier incarnations, but this, sadly, is a disappointment.
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
gunsgirl says...
4 years ago
Ignore the ratings, this is a wonderful whimsical film about parallel lives of a movie director. Adam Driver is great as is Jonathan Price. A movie about a film director who returns to a little town where 10 years earlier as film student made a movie using locals as actors. Upon his return 10 years later the main actor in his little movie is still playing the part in reality. Great movie..... watch it
Like  -  Dislike  -  001
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by VWFringe
2 years ago
@gunsgirl Agree with you 100%. Wanted to throw in two points which baked my noodle a bit extra (though seeing the giants....): Terry Gilliam had been trying to get this film done for possibly forty or fifty years, and, two, the director in the film was only famous for doing commercials, and it was a commercial that was being filmed at the beginning (closing credits list the first Don &amp; Sancho with the word _commercial_ next to their role, so perhaps he was already predisposed to ~~living a fantasy~~ accepting the mantle he had passed down to his heir, the humble shoemaker.<br /> <br /> Also, I _think_ Terry Gilliam wove in some lines which duplicated lines from his earlier films, "Time Bandits," and, "The Adventures of Baron Munchausen," but, I know for sure the ending twist directly paralleled his movie, "Brazil," where the main character finds redemption &amp; earns his freedom, but only in his dreams. Not having read Don Quixote, I wonder if Terry Gilliam's earlier films had informed this one, or had he been trying to do this film in his earlier ones?<br /> <br /> Still, "a wonderful whimsical film." Imagining Adam Driver as Don Quixote, and his girlfriend, "Sancho," entertaining her Father, the town's People, and the illegal aliens to earn their food (or whatever was in that bag) brings a smile to my face.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top