Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Reviews for: Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

fergusoni
10/10  6 years ago
I'm not saying everyone has to like this movie, but if you thought it was tedious, boring and slow, you obviously missed the point. This film is a masterpiece, based on a masterpiece novel by a master storyteller, who didn't need explosions and chases and fight scenes to keep a story interesting, and doesn't have it's characters borderline breaking the fourth wall just to tell a brain-dead audience what is going on. Watching Tinker Tailor required a lot of concentration, for me at least, and that's what I loved, wracking my brain to try and work out the fine details, which is why I understand a lot of people wouldn't enjoy it, because they'd rather sit back and relax and switch the old noggin off. in my opinion though, the best film is a film that challenges you, doesn't hand you everything on a silver platter, and doesn't stick with the grossly overused Hollywood formula and cliches. That is why I choose to rate this film so high, as well as the absolutely wonderful acting by some of the UK's best, where looks, expressions and gestures mean just as much as words themselves. The cinematography and music also top the film off nicely, with the film-grain look being quite prominent and the minimal, held-back music. Absolute 70s magic
Like  -  Dislike  -  10
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
zmirburger
CONTAINS SPOILERS2/10  3 years ago
Absolutely terrible movie for those who doesn't know the backstory of this movie.
I was completely clueless for the first 30 mins, went on wiki to understand the first 30 mins by reading the plot (which is in order on wiki so you wont get any spoilers).
Another 30 mins, still confused, went on wiki again to understand.
Another 45 mins, STILL confused, went on wiki again.
Movie ended, completely unsatisfied and wished i could get back my 2 hours.

The storytelling in this movie is absolutely HORRENDOUS, one of the worst i have ever seen.
(POTENTIAL SPOILERS) for the reasons why below:

[spoiler]1. There was no backstory to ANY character, they just throw you in the movie with like 10 characters and expect you to remember all their names
2. They switch between using the first name and the last name when talking about each other, which makes you have to remember even MORE names
3. Some of them and the organizations have CODENAMES, which makes you have to memorize EVEN MORE names.
4. Each 'plot point' lasts only like 5 seconds after it is revealed, leaving you no time to absorb and try to understand what the heck is going on.
5. There are plenty of stories in this movie, but instead of going on and fully explaning one, they just jump between each other non stop.[/spoiler]

I would give it 1 star, but i decided to give 2, because of the incredible cast and acting.
Like  -  Dislike  -  11
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by Ethan Tocco
6 months ago
@zmirburger Thank you, this is exactly how it felt. I had no idea what was going on the entire time, and was bored to tears.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
CinemaSerf
/10  2 years ago
Many folks will remember the wonderful BBC adaptation of this John Le Carré story that featured the late Sir Alec Guinness as the measured and sagely "George Smiley" character. This time, this almost as superior adaptation places an on-form Gary Oldman in that role. What role? Well having just been pensioned off, he is re-recruited by "C" (John Hurt) to try and track down a KGB spy deep within the fabric of MI6. It's fair to say that, as this story starts to unfold, we discover there are plenty of suspects and the classily written story bombards us with characterful and suspicious scenarios that might be true, might be half-true, or might just be genuine red herrings! A formidable cast of British stalwarts add richness to this complex but not convoluted tale of deceit and betrayal. Tom Hardy, Colin Firth and even the usually unimpressive Mark Strong chip in well but my plaudits go to the truly odiously ambitious Toby Jones ("Alieline") and to Benedict Cumberbatch's "Guillam". Tomas Alfredson has paced this film well. It can appear slow at times, but on the second time of watching I appreciated there was much more substance to some of the dialogue, the nuanced efforts from the stars and from a very well crafted period production. It just goes to show that less can definately be more when the writing and acting do all the heavy lifting in concert, leaving the pyrotechnics and visual effects in their boxes.
Like  -  Dislike  -  0
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Filipe Manuel Dias Neto
/10  2 years ago
**Despite a great cast and good script material, the film is tiring, stagnant, a bit gray and boring to watch.**

This film is a remake of an older film from 1973 (I haven't seen it yet, but I intend to), both of which are film adaptations of a spy novel that was written by John Le Carrée. Being the original story known for its quality and this film being an elaborate super production and with a cast full of established names, I was expecting a great film… but the truth is that I felt disappointed in that expectation. The movie is not as interesting and good as I would have liked.

In fact, the film has a lot of well-known actors, with the strongest and most impactful performance given to us by an experienced Gary Oldman. The actor regained his native English accent and was able to masterfully adapt to the character, fully deserving the Oscar nomination for Best Actor he received that year. Besides him, Toby Jones and Colin Firth were also in great shape in this film, but Benedict Cumberbatch, John Hurt and Tom Hardy are not far behind them.

The story is relatively simple: in the midst of Cold War intrigue, MI6 tried to help a Soviet officer defect in Budapest. This officer knew the identity of a double agent, undercover in the British services. However, the operation goes very badly and it becomes evident to the leaders of MI6 that there really are one or more traitors, very well placed within the secret service. To find out who they are, they call in George Smiley, a retired agent with a lot of experience.

On a technical level, I can't help but appreciate the dark cinematography and the way it tries to recreate the dirty, foggy and somewhat paranoid atmosphere of Cold War London, in addition to the atmosphere of British houses of that time and all the effort of the set and costumes. The film is effective in its effort to transport us to the time and context, and manages to place itself in a pleasantly paranoid environment, where everyone is suspicious of everyone else. It's not an action movie and, therefore, the effects are few and discreet, functional.

Despite strong performances from the cast and excellent source material and well-written script, the film has two main issues: atmosphere and pacing. Tomas Alfredson deliberately slowed the film, and that makes the film tiresome and boring, if you add the lack of movement, the endless dialogue, the way each action and movement takes as long as possible in front of the camera. Also, one has to be very attentive to the names of the various characters, and their role in the film, or we will never understand the plot while watching the film.
Like  -  Dislike  -  0
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Kenneth Axel Carlsson
/10  6 years ago
The russians have placed a mole within the Circus (who is the british intelligence service, by the way). George Smiley (Gary Oldman), having been fired from the Circus, has now been rehired (secretly) to find the mole. He assembles his small team and begins to look into the matters. The possibilities are plenty, Percy (Toby Jones), Esterhase (David Dencik), Roy Bland (Ciaran Hinds) and Bill Haydon (Colin Firth). His old friend, Control (John Hurt), even suspected George himself of being the mole.

This movie is directed by a personal favorite of mine, Tomas Alfredson, who also created the vampire movie, _Let the Right One In_ (Lad den rette komme ind), as well as the amazing, _Four Shades of Brown_ (fire nuancer af brun). He is a master of creating a dark and mysterious atmosphere, and does exactly that in this movie. The pace is slow, the music is scarce and the colours are old and faded, perfect for a spy movie such as this.

Watching this movie is like watching a puzzle being carefully put together in front of you. It takes time to get it just right, and you have to look carefully at all the pieces. Good things takes time, and this movie understands that. The viewer has to watch carefully, because it constantly goes from the present and into the past. People who have died, are resurrected in the memories of the past, to help us construct the final image.

_Last words... this movie will not appeal to everyone, it requires the viewer to be active, watch carefully, and to appreciate the slow narrative. I will gladly admit that I have tried watching this movie three times before I finally succeeded in watching all of it. I am not normally a fan of these sort of movies, but I can always appreciate spectacular acting, and the craftmanship of a truly great director, and so, this movie becomes so much more than just a spy movie. It becomes a movie about people living on the edge of a war, trying to survive, trying to find the one threat that might break down the wall and destroy the british empire._
Like  -  Dislike  -  0
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top