Casting Claudia with an 18 year old is just stupid.

The fact that she looks like a child is the anchor of her entire story.

Making the melancholic Louis into a black person who was more brutal (being a pimp in the early 20th century we can assume he did more than was shown) in life than as a vampire was already weird - this change however breaks my heart.
Make her black, asian, whatever - but she has to be a child - otherwise the whole story has no point (which will probably be remedied by more crying about how unfair life as a black person in america is).

Why does every story have to be changed in existential ways these days?
It would probably have been better to leave this story be instead of making this.

Don't get me wrong, the show isn't plain bad - but calling it "Interview with the Vampire" and saying it is based on Anne Rice's novel is a stretch. Other than the name there aren't many simmilarites left.

- They changed the era to early 20th century (FROM 1791!!!!!) making Louis a bit over 100 years old
- This is "another meeting", so Louis hadn't even lived a full human lifespan when he first did the interview
- Claudia is not a child
- Louis was in a brutal line of work - quite successful and black instead of a white drunk
- Louis keeps in touch with his family for a long time

These changes already preclude some of the storylines, showing a total disrespect towards the source material - it is just another one of these instances where they want to push a message to ppl who have no interest in it by using a successful IP.

7/10 if it was an original work, -6 points for the impunity makes a 1/10!

I have read Anne Rice's vampire novels, not all of them but enough to get a clear impression of her writing style, characterisations and settings for her work.

Interview with the Vampire, for me, largely misses the mark on each and every count.The characters don't feel like the Rice's, they lack the personality and finesse, she infused her characters with. The time period/setting is in many respects, off the mark, too.

Worse still, there's is politic's infused into this work. There's a dash of rather obvious negative Russian messaging and yet more woke-ism, I personally, could have done without.

Acting is of a high standard. I feel its a genuine shame so much else is off. This could have worked if they had paid closer attention to Rice's actual work and knocked off the unwelcome messaging.

In short, high production values and decent acting can't save this series from feeling, to this fan, nothing like Rice's work. The movie with Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise from the 90's, beautifully captures Rice's work and is my recommended screen adaptation.

So this is one of those titles that IMDb will remove your review if it's not positively glowing.

I'm not sure why, the source material was already really progressive. It was essentially a story about two Gay men who happen to be vampires... and their violent break up. But it was subtle, it was artistic, and it had more of a story to tell about good and evil among other things.

Subtle is the key, because in the 2022 version, there is nothing subtle or artistic. Vampires can't have sex in the novels to up the sexual tension and angst. In this title I guess they didn't think it would be woke enough if it wasn't 9 and 1/2 Weeks with Vampires.

And then they changed Louis, which means that they had to change the entire timeline of the title, and that caused a little bit of complications with everything else, because even though there was a strong message about freeing his slaves in the book... they couldn't have it in the movie...

...Because when you are woke things don't need to make any sense.

And they aged Claudia up, and that presented significant changes and relieved some of what made her character so compelling.

In the end they took a beautiful novel and turned it into cheap fan fiction porn with politics and the people are eating it up.

Because in this day and age, you can't respect the source material, you have to trash it.