Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Reviews for: The Sandman

tropolite
/10  2 years ago
This was my introduction to The Sandman. I had no comic book references to be made aware of or characters, just went into this series blind.

The first few episodes were good... the continuity was good and there were surprises along the way that I wasn't expecting to come up again as they were well downplayed to begin with.

The Constantine character was interesting to see it played as a woman, how 'different' and of course the character of Lucifer. I loved seeing these actors again and many other well known actors in guest roles.

Then there was just a wierd cafe moment that somewhat went predictably bad in a depraved way. Then the show just kept slipping... more bad white straight men, every extrovert imaginable, and the episodes just kept slipping in story.

I'm surprised the Crow, Matthew isn't depicted as gay, as every other character seems bent in one form or another in this series. My daughter is gay so I don't have a problem with it in the right context of movies and entertainment.
But too much is too much. It started grinding the show into bits.

I watch shows to be entertained not indoctrinated.
I had high hopes for this show going into it... the first few episodes were good, fun and interesting.

I can overlook the boring but still seemingly mandatory gender swapping on occasion showrunners still think or believe is novel, courageous, new, and empowering, but it's not.

I slept on my thoughts before I put them here, it didn't change my perspective and the last four episodes were lack lustre. I had high hopes for this series as I started it but over the course of the season toward the end I find I'm probably not returning if there is a Season 2.
Like  -  Dislike  -  32
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by xupamlou
2 years ago
@tropolite As someone who has read the comics I can tell you that having that many LGBT+ characters is not something new and "woke", the characters from the 1988 comics are that way and is not accidental. Gaiman decided to have that many queer characters in response to Thatcher's policies against LGBT+. Policies that forbid in schools talking about diversity of sexual orientation, gender or family style. Support groups were shut down and schools where diversity was addressed stopped receiving funding. There are still 80 countries in which is illegal being gay or trans, and 10 of them which have death penalty for the crime of being different. 34 years have passed since that law and we still need those amazing characters.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  20

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by tropolite
2 years ago
@xupamlou Hi and thank you for enlightening me on the history of The Sandman and it's conception. So if I understand you correctly the series is true to the comic book series and it was these that were intentionally politically heavy weighted with gay representation. So the current TV series isn't forced but it was the original source that was politically forced.<br /> <br /> I won't expand the political discussion as this isn't the venue for that. As I said in my original post I enjoyed the first handful of episodes as the story and the concepts were very interesting and unique. The leading characters were intriguing and the initial story arc has a ton of merit. The following arc from ep 6 maybe 7 just ramped up the priority of 'gay' and the story took a back seat. And please understand I'm a nearly 61yr old straight white guy with a gay daughter who I love unconditionally, but it was hard to push through the 'gay' to get to the story. I'm probably screwing up my explanation. For an example a good show, the story is the primary, the characters you develop an association.<br /> If I wanted to watch a movie like 'The Sum of All Fears' and it had gratuitous sex all the way through it would diminish the story and the movie.<br /> <br /> If the intention of The Sandman was to draw the LGBT audience then yes, but if it was to draw a wider audience toning down the saturation and the focus of what orientation a character is may hold more audience numbers. What is the catch cry we normally hear 'diversity' and 'inclusion' but in actuality it is more exclusionary when it comes down to it.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  10

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top