If I have to describe _The Serpent_ in one sentence, it would be – _a mess of casting and accents:_

**- The casting** - Charles Sobhraj is Frenchman of Indian and Vietnamese parentage but Tahar Rahim is a French actor of Algerian descent. Close enough for BBC, I guess. :laughing: Several times in the series Sobhraj refer to himself as an _‘Asian’_ and I was like, where is this _‘Asian’_ he was talking about?!
**- The accents** – At first, I was very confused why all these British diplomats are concerned about two Dutch backpackers. Colonizers support colonizers? :thinking: Turns out they are supposed to be Dutch, German, Belgian. Oh! :open_mouth: Their terrible accents come and go, so you can easily tell they are all English actors. I hate when USA/UK make movies set in foreign countries but everyone conveniently speaks English instead of their native languages. :rolling_eyes:

**Other problems I have with this show:**

- This series did not portray Charles Sobhraj accurately. In real life he was a mystique and captivating, but this is lacking in Rahim's portrayal. He plays Sobhraj in a very flat and dull manner. The constant blank stare into the distance wasn't enough to convince me he had any charisma.

- The constant jumping back and forth in time isn’t executed smoothly. I'm sure BBC thought this was a clever device to create excitement/dynamism, but in fact it’s simply lazy and cheap way of story telling. A sloppy way of creating the drama to avoid having to tell the story well in a single timeline.

- The lack of dramatic tension. Only in episode 3 did I get excited about what might happen. The most moving scene of the series is Dominique getting home. No time was taken for the viewer to have any empathy with any of the characters/victims.

- All the _“Mary Sue/Marty Stu”_ characterization - from Knippenberg to Siemons, there are too many lazily written cartoon characters. Their sudden and unexpected outbursts of anger seemed way over the top. Next you have Nadine – too many scenes where she decided to scarify herself to help the investigation. It seemed way too exaggerated. Actually, the show focuses more on these characters instead of Charles Sobhraj, it should have been called, _“The people who hunt the Serpent down”._

- That leads to my next problem with the show. Since most of the show is for the _“good”_ Westerners, there is no mention of all Westerners helping Sobhraj in his crimes. The French businessman named Jean Dhuisme was left out. Barbara Smith (Canadian), Mary Ellen Eather (Australian), Hugey Courage (Belgian) were shown in the last episode but for a very brief moment, and no mention how Sobhraj recruited them. For some reason BBC didn’t want to focus on them, probably not to show colonizers in bad light. Westerns that aren’t rich enough to be rich in their _‘first world countries’_ love to move to poor countries to live out their millionaire fantasies. No mention of another Western criminal - Jacqueline Kuster (German), she met Charles while they were both in prison, she was 34, while he was 51 years old. They wanted to get married. Speaking of which, why was Nihita Biswas left out as well? It would have been interesting to see more about Sobhraj‘s life after he was sentenced to life imprisonment.

- The show is just facts of what Charles did only from the Wikipedia article about him, one would expect the writers to do more research.

- One last thing - I do realize that people in the 70s smoked more, but still it is repellent to watch every character smoking heavily in almost every scene.

A fascinating story told extremely poorly. The writing, direction and most of all editing is of such a low quality here and makes the show much more difficult to watch than it should be. None of the dialogue is natural and I was eventually screaming in anger at the screen whenever there was a time jump (which is every 10 minutes or so).

I'm wondering if there was some kind of rule that every scene needed to include a superfluous shot of a character lighting a cigarette or smoking one, especially while staring wistfully. Yeah we get it, people smoked in the 1970s. Apparently everyone.

The actors are a mixed bag too, with some doing well with the material they were given while others just aren't able to handle it. In particular, the lead role of Charles was miscast. Tahar Rahim projects none of the charisma we are supposed to understand the real man had, and is incredibly blank and flat throughout. Knippenberg is a problematic portrayal too, seemingly someone who will just have an angry, shouty outburst at the the tiniest provocation. How did this man become a diplomat if he's that on edge?

But there are good points. Jenna Coleman shows the most range and inhabits her role quite well (apart from the scenes where she seems to mimic Charles/Alain and just stares blankly at him while he speaks). I love the various accents and I think the cast did well there, with a wonderful use of different languages. The series makes good use of its locations and you can almost feel the heat. And on top of it all, the story itself is an intriguing one and easy to just let yourself get lost in. The show managed to create tension well where it was needed.

Less episodes would probably have benefited things, along with a much better method of telling the story.