12 Angry Men

Movie

1997

1h 57m

PG-13

English

Crime, Drama, TV Movie

User Score:

7.9

Critic Score:

Watch on Hoopla

During the trial of a man accused of his father's murder, a lone juror takes a stand against the guilty verdict handed down by the others as a result of their preconceptions and prejudices.

Play Trailer

12 Angry Men

PG-13

Movie

1997

1h 57m

English

Crime, Drama, TV Movie

Play Trailer

Watch on Hoopla

During the trial of a man accused of his father's murder, a lone juror takes a stand against the guilty verdict handed down by the others as a result of their preconceptions and prejudices.

WATCHMODE

7.9

IMDB

CRITIC SCORE

Where to watch

FREE

Rent

$5.99SD

Buy

$14.99SD

Available in 4 other countries.

Filter sources:

See something wrong? Let us know

My Friends' Ratings

In order to see what your friends rated 12 Angry Men, you need a Watchmode account. It's free and takes just a minute. Create an account

Cast

Foreman

Juror 2

Juror 3

Juror 4

Juror 5

Juror 6

Juror 7

Juror 8

Juror 9

Juror 10

Juror 11

Juror 12

Judge

Guard

The Accused

Directed By: William Friedkin

Written By: Reginald Rose (Story)

Featured Comments/Tips

Cd001111 says...

8 years ago

I think the movie is the version from 1957 and not the remake as indicated in fact I'm positive.

Like - Dislike - Comment - 10 1

AlfieSGD says...

3 months ago

If you don't know the original, then "12 Angry Men" from 1997 is certainly a fantastic movie. However, as a new version of the 1957 film of the same name, it is a somewhat superfluous remake. This is because director William Friedkin decided to stick exactly to the original. Apart from a slightly more diverse cast, there are virtually no changes. Even the court case, including the discussion between the jurors, is virtually identical. Accordingly, there are no surprises. That doesn't make the movie bad in itself, but there isn't really any reason to watch the 1997 version over the original.

Like - Dislike - Comment - 00 0

WalkingKev says...

3 months ago

Can't say anything bad about the movie itself, great acting and perfect story. When I saw there was a remake of the 1957 classic, I wasn't interested at all, the high rating convinced me to watch it but I'm slightly disappointed. I don't see any reason to remake such a classic especially when most of the dialouge is an exact copy. I think it could have been far greater if it was a new case or did something different. Therefore I'd say this is a really good movie but I don't see any reason to recommend this over the original one.

Like - Dislike - Comment - 00 0

wolfkin says...

2 years ago

I think it's a rather successful remake.

Like - Dislike - Comment - 00 0

Show all comments (5) Leave comment

Featured User Reviews

Filipe Manuel Neto

9 months ago

**A needless and unnecessary remake, but that was very well done and does not disrespect the original.**

What usually happens when a remake of a film so acclaimed and so well remembered comes out that it's considered a classic? As a rule, we tend to think that the remake was totally unnecessary a More

Like - Dislike - Comment - 00 0

Show all reviews (1) Write Review