Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Comments for: Slumber Party Massacre II

Lee Brown Barrow says...
12 months ago
Somehow worse than the first movie - and that one was dreadful!
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
AlfieSGD says...
5 months ago
Even though "Slumber Party Massacre II" is a fun slasher in places, the movie is ultimately pretty pointless. Although the killer has a much cooler look than in the first part, his integration into the plot is really nonsensical. And yet, the group of "teenagers" who are the focus here are actually not that bad. However, you can't really get excited because there is never any real sense of danger. Unfortunately, the kills aren't exactly creative either. There is also surprisingly little nudity for an 80s slasher. Overall, I would say that the ingredients for a better movie are definitely there, but the execution is poor.
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
OffbeatParadox says...
a month ago
**Too ridiculous to not enjoy!**
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
beardedmovienut says...
one year ago
Slumber Party Massacre II has no real resemblance to the first one. It's actually more of a cheap Nightmare on Elm Street rip-off than a Slumber Party Massacre sequel. It's slow to get started, and never really gets going until the last half hour or so. The ending also leaves a lot of questions... Is this all in the girls head? Is she actually in a mental hospital? Is the villain real or not? All things I'd like an answer to...

Anyway... For the first half, this felt like a dud, but it picked itself up to be mildly entertaining. Not on par with the first one, though. That's for sure...
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Movie_Mike says...
3 years ago
So Bad it's good 80's slasher film
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
CaptainVG313 says...
4 years ago
So cool seeing a young Crystal Bernard.
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
geondp says...
5 years ago
This movie was bad. the first had some redeeming qualities, this is just a flaming pile of garbage. no boobies the kills are inadequate, just stay away!
Like  -  Dislike  -  001
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Reply by Movie_Mike
3 years ago
@geondp one pair of naked boobies and one shirt off bra on pair of boobies. But it's really bad.
Reply  -  Like  -  Deslike  -  00

Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
KurtMoney says...
7 years ago
Awful. Just awful. You can tell this came post-Freddy because the first 55 minutes are nothing but imaginary "dream kills." No joke, in this 75 minute movie, the first real, actual death happens just before the hour mark. Unacceptable! There are no rules, or rhyme or reason to why anything happens in this movie. Where does the killer come from? Why them? Why real all of a sudden? I get it, we can all have a good time with their totally 80s all ladies rock band, and oh boy, the killer has his own song he performs while chasing them down. Just terrible. Make a music video then. Don't waste my time selling it as a sequel to a totally okay slasher. Luckily they returned to the roots a bit with part 3, but even that gets derailed by the end.
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
MiNH0 says...
2 years ago
Very lame attempt to be Nightmare on Elm Street. It does have everything good slasher should have but its mixed with some ingredients that shouldnt be there.

+ guitardrill
- "out of place" music
- "oh a i like this song" and subsequently singing /and dancing/
Like  -  Dislike  -  000
Please use spoiler tags: [spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top