Type in any movie or show to find where you can watch it, or type a person's name.

User Reviews for: Werewolf of London

Keeper70
/10  4 years ago
Made six years before the more famous ‘Wolfman’ of Lon Chaney Jnr this was the first proper werewolf film and was responsible for the lore that follows these creatures for the most in filmland. Being bitten by a werewolf makes you one, turning into the creature only on the night of the full moon, seeking out those they love the most, all come from this film. Prior to this witches both male and female could turn themselves into a werewolf by magic, sometimes a salve rubbed all over their bodies, the kinky devils, once I read by drinking water from the pawprint of a wolf, which is a bit unfortunate. Clearly, this film wanted to make the character who became the werewolf a victim and not a ‘bad’ protagonist, hench no control over the change or murderous impulses.

Therein lies the rub. Wilfred Glendon, played by an American born in Kentucky, is truly English upper-class from that time (and even now) the rod up his arse has a rod up its arse. He has a beautiful young fun-loving wife, Lisa, who he totally neglects for flesh-eating plants and the moonlight blooming only Mariphasa. Little wonder we get a slight sliver of sexual tension when his wife’s former beau, Paul Ames, played by an actual Englishman Lester Matthews, rolls up and starts banging on about the old days. Good job he is wearing nice loose-fitting trousers. So straight away it is extremely hard to have much sympathy with this dusty old botanist.

We are treated to Hollywood’s version of the upper class of England at the time and to be fair it probably was not that far from the truth. Although stagey, it was 1935 to be fair, the party scenes bounce along with the wonderfully named and I have to say attractive, Spring Byington, dragging the scenes from the mundane with her turn as Miss Ettie Coombes Lisa’s aunt. Wonderfully ‘great auntish’ but played with a coquettish glee. She even gets sloshed later at a party at her house. I was hoping she did not become a victim to the hairy fellow and she did not.

Miss Ettie Coombes was ably supported in the comic relief slot by veteran actors Ethel Griffies and Zeffie Tilbury playing respectfully the wonderfully named Mrs. Whack and Mrs. Moncaster, ne’er-do-well dosshouse landladies. Straight off the music hall stage with and well-practiced to and froing verbal banter and some less than subtle physical comedy this should not have worked but even today it does not jar from the overall spectacle.

The story is clearly a werewolf story so after the initial peek a boo and seemingly scared werewolf at the beginning we then wait for quite some time before Henry Hull transforms into the murderous creature, the worst part of a wolf and the worst part of a man. Contrary to popular belief the original make-up for the transformation was not rejected by Hull because he did not want the ordeal of hours in the make-up chair but because the script clearly said the Glendon had to be recognised as Glendon when he was the werewolf. Jack Pierce’s original test was similar to Lon Chaney’s version in later movies and in that style, you could not tell who it was.
Due to this the werewolf in this film is more akin to Mr Hyde rather than Lon Chaney’s true beast, albeit a beast in the shirt and trousers. So much so than when he goes looking for a floozie to slaughter he remembers to put his coat and hat on, which I remember when I watched this as a young lad, had me in stitches and it still looks incongruous now.

The look of London and England in general is clearly Hollywood, in particular the Harley Davidson motorcycles with wailing sirens near the end – did the UK police even have motorbikes in the 1930s? They certainly did not have sirens. Tibet is the same valley as the hilarious Captain Kirk fight with the Gorn from Star Trek and the Tibetan spoken is pure gibberish.
Werewolf of London is close to 100 years old and it is not fair to point out the creaking structure and weak points but in the context of the time it was made it was an entertaining film. The ‘monster’ itself is now as scary as slightly annoyed dog and gruesomeness amounts to some claw slashes and Hull in shaggy dog make-up going extreme close up to the camera. I am not sure even 1930s audiences would have been that terrified even with their little exposure to horror in those days.

This film flopped on its realise and Henry Hull and experience and serious actor never again ventured into the horror genre, interestingly enough his character was going to be played by Boris Karloff and Warner Orland, a Swedish man who ended up playing Fu Man Chu and Charley Chan (he also played a character called Dr. Boris Karlov but let’s leave that one out), who played the slightly odd Dr Yogami a character originally slated for Bela Lugosi. One wonders what the film would have been with these two more established horror film actors in place and how this film would have been received.

Werewolf of London definitely has an important place in the early annuls of horror-film history and certainly led the way for bigger and better films. The make-up tested for it become 1941’s The Wolfman’s iconic ‘bear in a suit’ look and rules of being an unwilling werewolf sprouted from here and therefore influence a great deal of werewolf fiction right up to the present day.

One fantastic point of note. The slim, pretty young thing playing Glendon’s unfortunate wife, Lisa, was Valerie Hobson, who retired in 1954 after marrying the British Conservative MP John Profumo. If this name is not familiar to you, look him up. Hobson got mixed up in one of Britain’s biggest political horror stories in its own right, full of British upper-class fools, stiffly walking about and hee-hawing more than anyone in this film.

Do not expect An American Werewolf in London or any horror film made after the 1940s and prepare for stagey slow dialogue-heavy set-pieces and Werewolf of London (made in America) should be an interesting look in the history of early horror.
Like  -  Dislike  -  10
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
John Chard
/10  4 years ago
The werewolf is neither man nor wolf, but a Satanic creature with the worst qualities of both.

Dr. Wilfred Glendon (Henry Hull) is in Tibet searching for the rare mariphasa plant that apparently only blooms under moonlight. Upon finding the plant his joy is obvious but it's quickly short lived as he is attacked by a half-man half-wolf type creature. He manages to fight off the creature but it does draw blood before retreating off into the mountains. Back in London, Glendon works tirelessly to get the plant to bloom under artificial light, neglecting his wife Lisa (Valerie Hobson) in the process. But that's not the only worry he has to contend with, with the arrival of the mysterious Dr. Yogami (Warner Oland) comes news of lycanthrophobia and the true value of the mariphasa plant...

The names Universal Studios and Werewolves go hand in hand (or paw in paw if you like). Automatically images of a pained Lon Chaney Jr howling at the moon come quickly into the conscious, yet quite some years earlier Universal had already ventured into the realms of lycanthropy. Firstly they had offered up "The Werewolf", a silent short film in 1913 that sadly is thought to have long been lost in a fire in 1924, and then in 1935 they released "Werewolf Of London". The first mainstream werewolf picture and first to feature anthropomorphic werewolves. It can't be understated just how important "Werewolf Of London" is in the pantheon of Universal classic horror. It also helps that it also happens to be a rather fine picture in its own right. Interestingly blending the werewolf legend with science fiction elements, the script is intelligent, the scenic sets impressive and director Stuart Walker keeps it taut and suspenseful.

In spite of what you may have read on some internet sites, the cast deliver the goods, particularly Henry Hull who it should be remembered is playing a vastly different type of werewolf to the one Chaney would play six years later. This is after all a wolf-man who pops on his hat and cloak and strides out into the dimly lit night. Hull also comes up trumps with the emotional aspects of Glendon. Observe the expressive acting as Glendon's cat turns against him, the hurt and then the horrific realisation of what awaits him is vividly portrayed during one heartfelt scene. Another sees Glendon proclaim "Singularly Single, madame. More single than I ever realised that it was possible for a human being to be," this is fine stuff delivered with style and emotion by the well spoken Hull.

The support is very tidy from Hobson, Oland, Lester Matthews and Lawrence Grant, but they are unsurped by the comic relief that comes in the form of Ethel Griffies & Zeffie Tilbury as batty bints, Whack & Moncaster. A right couple of old dears who stick their noses in where they shouldn't and enjoy knocking each other out! I kid you not. Yet perhaps surprisingly this humour sits easily within the structure of the story. Another testament to the good work done by all involved. While rounding out the treats is the make up work from pioneer supreme, Jack P Pierce (AKA Janus Piccoulas). This is not one for the boo jump scare brigade, or even for those after a bit of old fashioned blood letting. This is tight story telling with a good production and acting to match. Twas a pleasant surprise indeed. 8/10
Like  -  Dislike  -  0
Please use spoiler tags:[spoiler] text [/spoiler]
Back to Top