Back to The Head Hunter

The Head Hunter - Comments & Tips

Clerxam'
Clerxam'7 years ago

what a complete f*** waste of time..

SirNovad
SirNovad7 years ago

This is a simple story, told in a slow but beautiful fashion. The production design is really fantastic for such a low budget title. This also means action is offscreen (audio only) except for the finale which is kinda underwhelming with the limited tools the budget gives. Fans of everthing Viking 'amp; horror might like this however, or even aspiring filmmakers to see what you can achieve with such a budget.

kuuzo
kuuzo7 years ago

Probably the best movie I''ve seen this year.

ecnef
ecnef6 years ago

I liked the look and atmosphere of this film, but the story/character wasn''t developed enough. In the end felt as though it needed something more

NTOTOKUL
NTOTOKUL3 months ago

The film is not bad, just remove from memory the last scene that makes sense like a beardless Viking, for the rest if you have nothing to do it can be slightly better than watching TV off, whats a waste of a good actor

Dulneth.P
Dulneth.P2 years ago

No budget or what not, but what were they trying to achieve here? Complete waste of time.

Rakib Hossain Aiman

This movie is pure grade A.ASS

csrz
csrz3 years ago

This was a lot better than expected. I went into this expecting a brutal, violent, action-packed horror but what I got is a slow survival/revenge tale instead. But I'm incredibly impressed by how compelling this film actually is. There's a lot to admire in this low-budget effort. The story while minimal works incredibly well and what it lacks in action makes up for overbearing sense of dread and alluring atmosphere of the period it is set in. It does feel like a short film that is stretched out to fit a feature length, but for me its 72-minute runtime is still tolerable. This obviously wonโ€™t work for everyone but I highly recommend this to anyone who's looking for a slow-burn revenge story.

LovesickDead
LovesickDead4 years ago

Low budget horror movie. Basically the budget went on costumes design and monster heads. It's very slow paced, hinting at a final battle against a mysterious monster (that doesn't repay the wait, unfortunately). Nice photography and Christopher Rygh is quite the sexy viking, at least.

Heronti
Heronti5 years ago
Spoilers

Its a good movie. i describe it as a minimalist atmospheric horror. Its a different approach to the genre, [spoiler] most of the action happens off screen, and stays for you to imagine it [/spoiler] , i think is because of the low budget (30,000 us dollars), but that is what made the different approach happen, we look more at the result of the hunt, [spoiler] than the hunt itself [/spoiler], the scenarios, the characterization of everything and the atmosphere are well made i think its worth your while, it is not a perfect movie, i think it could be improved, but its good

Davezn
Davezn 7 years ago

Do not waste your time on this movie.

davinci05
davinci056 years ago

I canโ€™t say anything bad about this film. My expectations were met and I was entertained to say the least. And that ending... whoa!

Xaro Rosu-deleted-1599333352

One of my favorite movies, very good

Saint Pauly
Saint Pauly5 years ago

Like a gorgeous dessert, this is incredibly rich but there is no meat. Clocking in at 70 minutes, this isn''t longer than it needs to be, and the costumes, prosthetics and set design are unbelievably good. Unfortunately, showing a man who has to protect his forest from monsters without showing him protecting his forest from monsters demonstrates a regrettable lack of funds. That and the absence of story in the slog of exposition remove many teeth from this movie. So, while Headhunter won''t satisfy your carnal desires, it is truly a feast for the eyes.

Loading

...