miguelreina

[Viaplay] It focus in the problem of young sexuality through social networks with a story already known, but told backwards, from the end to the beginning of the conflict. And so the series can be seen from episode 7 to 1 as it is structured, or from episode 1 to 7. The structure is not only a way of telling it differently, but also reveals situations that reflect on guilt and victimization.

Mika B

Not bad at all. I do see some good messages concerning the way teenage girls and women expose their body on the web. However... Sanna's story is pretty much a lie. She claims she got raped but [spoiler] we have understand it is not the number one meaning we give to the word. Rape here means that she got verbally forced to do things to pleasure a man's lust. :thinking: Her wrong is making up like a woman that got beaten while being raped. [/spoiler] And she won the damn trial afterwards???

psonnosp

This backwards timeline thing might have looked as a good idea in the pitch but it's very poorly executed and accompanied by bad directing in general. Yet another Viaplay Original flop.

[email protected]

This is a cautionary tale, told backwards. If it had been told chronologically you would see a tale of innocence lost. By telling it backwards, I think they hoped you would have wondered what happened. I’m not sure it made it the thriller they hoped it would be and I think the reversion fractured our connection to the characters, which is crucial if you want it to be a cautionary tale or an engaging story. (Was that convoluted enough for you? It was analogous to the failed storytelling of this series.). Amalia Holm (Bjelke) is a star by any standards. (I followed her here from MOTHERLAND: FORT SALEM) It’s a tragic tale, poorly organized. I give this limited series a 4 (poor) out of 10. [Drama]