Quantum of Solace

Movie

2008

1h 46m

PG-13

English

Adventure, Action, Thriller, Crime

User Score:

6.4

Critic Score:

Rent From $2.49

Betrayed by Vesper, the woman he loved, 007 fights the urge to make his latest mission personal. Pursuing his determination to uncover the truth, Bond and M interrogate Mr. White, who reveals that the organization that blackmailed Vesper is far more complex and dangerous tha...

Play Trailer

Quantum of Solace

PG-13

Movie

2008

1h 46m

English

Adventure, Action, Thriller, Crime

Play Trailer

Rent From $2.49

WATCHMODE

6.4

IMDB

CRITIC SCORE

Where to watch

Rent

$3.994K

$2.99SD

$3.89SD

$3.99HDX

$3.994K

$3.99SD

Buy

$14.994K

$14.99HD

$14.99HDX

$14.994K

$12.99HD

Available in 4 other countries.

Filter sources:

See something wrong? Let us know

My Friends' Ratings

In order to see what your friends rated Quantum of Solace, you need a Watchmode account. It's free and takes just a minute. Create an account

Cast

James Bond

Camille Montes

Dominic Greene

René Mathis

Strawberry Fields

Felix Leiter

Gregg Beam

Mr. White

Elvis

Bill Tanner

Foreign Secretary

General Medrano

Fernando Guillén Cuervo

Colonel of Police

Jesús Ochoa

Lt. Orso

Lucrezia Lante della Rovere

Gemma

Henry Mitchell

Guy Haines

Yusef

Corinne Veneau

Monsieur Slate

Perla de las Dunas Receptionist

Brendan O'Hea

Forensics Tech

Rufus Wright

Treasury Agent

Sarah Hadland

Ocean Sky Receptionist

Directed By: Marc Forster

Written By: Neal Purvis (Screenplay), Paul Haggis (Screenplay), + 2 more

Featured Comments/Tips

KurtMoney says...

8 years ago

An underrated Bond film. People like to make fun of the title. Whatevs. I'll admit the script was hurt by the strike, they did what they could, it's the shortest Bond film and Craig's least successful outing. I still like it, and a revisit is always worth it for the GREAT song, and that motorcycle flip Bond does in the beginning. So badass.

Like - Dislike - Comment - 30 7

zerojfb says...

7 years ago

Where is the class? Bond is usually about spectacle but it's also about the escapism provided by it's character's charm, poise and elegance. The director didn't get the memo and just filled the movie with action sequences sometimes too fast to enjoy. And Gemma Arterton's character just seems to have phoned in because Bond has to have sex with someone! What other purpose did she serve?! Vesper's allusions grow tiresome because they sound like an annoying reminder to an inner conflict that Bond needed to have in order for the movie not to seem a straightforward action movie. But it is. In short, a person who watched this as the very first 007 would ask: "What's so special about James Bond? This is just another generic action/spectacle movie...". Sadly, that person would be right...

Like - Dislike - Comment - 20 0

KevinSocial9697 says...

2 years ago

This film aged like fine wine in my opinion as it is so much better than I remember it being, the story is actually fairly solid and well-directed by Marc Forster who is not a super well-known director but he handled the action really well but not as good as Casino Royale or Skyfall. I think the reason this film feels every better now if firstly I recommend watching straight after Casino Royale which shows it is actually a perfect continuation and also the bond lady is probably one of the strongest in the entire franchise as she is not a romantic interest and yet you find you love every moment between Olga Kurylenko (Camille Montes) and Daniel Craig (James Bond) who proves he is definitive as the character and loves the franchise. The fact that this film is much better than I remembered and knowing it was made during the writing strike, just makes me love it more and more. Give it a second chance.

Like - Dislike - Comment - 10 0

PorterUk says...

4 years ago

I was a huge fan of Casino Royale when the Daniel Craig reboot happened. When this film was released, it was advertised as a direct followup so I remember watching CR again and then heading straight the cinema to watch QoS. In my mind I've always therefore seen this is a direct continuation - the Extended version of Casino Royale, so to speak... As a standalone, it's not the best action thriller. It's a bit light on script and heavy on set-pieces. As a Bond film, I've seen worse in the Roger Moore and latter Connery days. But as a continuation of Casino Royale, it works well. I'll rate it as a standalone and give it a solid... 7/10

Like - Dislike - Comment - 10 0

Show all comments (20) Leave comment

Featured User Reviews

benoliver999

4/10 9 years ago

Flying high off the back of Casino Royale, Daniel Craig and co. return with this poorly-titled, somewhat short entry into the annals of Bond history.

The most glaring sore point is the weak, badly executed plot. We follow a businessman backing a Bolivian coup in return for the nation’s water su More

Like - Dislike - Comment - 30 0

LNero

8/10 2 years ago

James Bond versus Nestlé, featuring: greenwashing, offhand showing the CIA being terrorists, and only a little unintelligible British mumble acting. Possibly the only Bond film made, even to date, that has what counts as meaningful commentary on the geopolitical and economic events it sensationaliz More

Like - Dislike - Comment - 10 1

Jordyep

4/10 3 years ago

There are some individual moments that work, but this is overall a mess.
The story is hard to follow, the new characters aren’t interesting or memorable, and as many have pointed out: the editing sucks.
Just watch the airplane chase in this film and the one in _Mission Impossible: Fallout_ back More

Like - Dislike - Comment - 10 0

2 years ago

I'll make it quick. I watched this movie, and after some while I realised, I had seen this one before.

It's so forgettable, you can skip it without loss. Expect disappointment if you do watch it. It's just a run-off-the-mill action flick, basically.

Like - Dislike - Comment - 00 0

Show all reviews (17) Write Review